Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates
📽️ Media
|
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Adding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate name, quality, image description, categories and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
| |||||||||||||||||||
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2025 at 11:05:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Russia
Info all by Lvova -- Анастасия Львоваru/en 11:05, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Анастасия Львоваru/en 11:05, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2025 at 10:24:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#birds
Info created by Hobbyfotowiki – uploaded by Hobbyfotowiki – nominated by Hobbyfotowiki -- Hobbyfotowiki (talk) 10:24, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support (Hobbyfotowiki (talk) 10:40, 14 November 2025 (UTC)).
Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2025 at 09:38:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Metro Stations
Info Entrance to Wittenbergplatz subway station in Berlin at blue hour. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 09:38, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ermell (talk) 09:38, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:48, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2025 at 09:37:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural_phenomena/Weather#Snow
Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:37, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:37, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2025 at 09:19:30 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Uzbekistan
Info Ornaments Andijan Jame Mosque Complex, Andijan, Uzbekistan. Made on wood. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 09:19, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 09:19, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:43, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 10:54, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2025 at 08:41:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Tunisia
Info created by Bill.pix – uploaded by Bill.pix – nominated by Ovva olfa -- Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 08:41, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 08:41, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment Very good scene. But first
chromatic aberration should be removed. --August (talk) 09:43, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2025 at 08:12:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Iceland#Southern_Region_(Suðurland)
Info View of the Breiðamerkurjökull glacier on Iceland. All by me -- Jakubhal 08:12, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Jakubhal 08:12, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:11, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2025 at 05:32:57 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae
Info Flowers of Tansy (Tanacetum vulgare). Focus stack of 28 photos.}}
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:32, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:32, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:10, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:43, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2025 at 00:03:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Aegithalidae_(Long-tailed_Tits)
Info A long-tailed tit (Aegithalos caudatus), c/u/n by Alexis Lours -- Alexis Lours (talk) 00:03, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Alexis Lours (talk) 00:03, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Polinova (talk) 01:06, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:05, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:03, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:11, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:44, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2025 at 21:59:24 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Tunisia
Info created by Majbri wael – uploaded by Majbri wael – nominated by Majbri wael -- Majbri wael (talk) 21:59, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Majbri wael (talk) 21:59, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2025 at 21:30:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family: Phalacrocoracidae (Cormorants)
Info A close-up of a double crested cormorant in breeding plumage. We have a couple double-crested cormorant FPs but none in breeding plumage. Created, uploaded, and nominated by Polinova -- Polinova (talk) 21:30, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Polinova (talk) 21:30, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support ZmajiZmajiZmaji (talk) 00:33, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Too bad the beak and so on are outside the focus, but this is good enough for me and quite a face! Someone should wear a face like that for Halloween. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:07, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:11, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Interesting colors, like smaragd. --Mile (talk) 09:24, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2025 at 20:31:57 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Tunisia
Info created by Majbri wael – uploaded by Majbri wael – nominated by Majbri wael -- Majbri wael (talk) 20:31, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Majbri wael (talk) 20:31, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2025 at 20:00:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Tunisia
Info created by Atef Ouni – uploaded by Atef Ouni – nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 20:00, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 20:00, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose that stone machine in center lacks sharpness, overall it looks like leaning perspective. --Gower (talk) 07:46, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2025 at 15:29:33 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Coraciiformes#Genus_:_Alcedo
Info A female common kingfisher (Alcedo atthis), c/u/n by Alexis Lours -- Alexis Lours (talk) 15:29, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Alexis Lours (talk) 15:29, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support ZmajiZmajiZmaji (talk) 15:59, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Pretty bird, good quality, nice light Cmao20 (talk) 20:24, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 21:50, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support We have 11 photos in Category:Featured pictures of Alcedo atthis, but I agree that this one is also an FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:12, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 07:36, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful. - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:47, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:05, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:11, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:44, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2025 at 09:31:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#North Macedonia
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:31, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:31, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support (ZmajiZmajiZmaji (talk) 12:35, 13 November 2025 (UTC))
Support. Lovely. JayCubby (talk) 17:28, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Really nice. --B. Jankuloski (talk) 19:22, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Simple but very pleasant Cmao20 (talk) 20:23, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 04:33, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment Ne znam šo e problem, ama nikako ne mi otvara komplet, a site ostali normalno kaj drugie, ama ovaa ne ne 1.pat, vtor veke. f/0.8 ? Kako napraj Save, pod šo ? --Mile (talk) 09:26, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
- Метаподатоците ги поправив (сега е f/4.5). А, тоа што не ја отвора во целосна резолуција е чудно и не ми е прв пат (сличен проблем имаше со оваа фотографија). Ја зачував како JPG и ја подигнав преку „Upload a new version of this file“. Оригиналната верзија гледам дека ја отвора како што треба. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:51, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
- Мислам дека го решив. Кликнав на „Original resolution“ и сега ми ја отвора како што треба. Провери како е кај тебе. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:26, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Da sega raboti. Se gleda gorska kuka, 1115 m. Malko secena e vo horizont, pak OK. QI. --Mile (talk) 10:37, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2025 at 09:23:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Croatia
Info Sipar archaeology site in Istria, Croatia. More info here. Shot with a camera suspended from a kite line.- All by ZmajiZmajiZmaji 09:23, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- ZmajiZmajiZmaji (talk) 09:23, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:09, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:32, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support A lot of aerial photos don't impress me as much as most other reviewers because I feel that they lack an outstanding composition to match the excellent technical achievement. This one succeeds. The composition is excellent. Cmao20 (talk) 20:23, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! :-) ... Composition is hard when you have a camera on a kite line some 200 m above and you are not really sure what it is looking at - so you just leave it up there taking photos by itself, walk the kite around a bit, and hope for the best (this happy anxiety ("did we get it?") is one of the best things about kite aerial photography though - kinda like in old times when you didn't know what you got until the film was developed). ZmajiZmajiZmaji (talk) 09:01, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:14, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:48, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:09, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2025 at 09:08:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Morocco
Info Ouirgane (elev. 900 m (3,000 ft)) is a commune in the High Atlas mountains in Morocco. The Yacoub el Mansour Reservoir borders Ouirgane on the west. Note: no FPs of settlements in Morocco. Created by Tagooty – uploaded by Tagooty – nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 09:08, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 09:08, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:22, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment FP-worthy to me, but please eliminate a dust spot in the upper right corner and a couple of fainter ones slightly to its left and just a tad down from it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:17, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Done @Ikan Kekek: Thanks for the eagle eye, I missed those with the light clouds streaking the sky. --Tagooty (talk) 09:02, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:53, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2025 at 04:13:45 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
Info created by Vitor Jubini/MTur via MTur Destinos – uploaded by Sintegrity – nominated by Falcão Alado -- Falcão Alado (talk) 04:13, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Falcão Alado (talk) 04:13, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Satisfying composition Cmao20 (talk) 07:10, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:04, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:10, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:31, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support, though the sky could be brighter. JayCubby (talk) 17:23, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20 and Jay. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:18, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2025 at 04:13:12 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Reflections
Info created by Cacio Murilo/MTur – uploaded by Marquinhos – nominated by Falcão Alado -- Falcão Alado (talk) 04:13, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Falcão Alado (talk) 04:13, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Gorgeous colours and reflections, but the sharpness is IMO borderline for FP Cmao20 (talk) 07:09, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2025 at 01:08:51 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Nebulae
Info created, uploaded, and nominated by Tk833 -- Tk833 (talk) 01:08, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tk833 (talk) 01:08, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful Cmao20 (talk) 07:08, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:06, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support TheBritinator (talk) 10:27, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:22, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support (ZmajiZmajiZmaji (talk) 12:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC))
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:10, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:26, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 15:28, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. I like the trend of individuals (it would be inaccurate to call them amateurs on account of the incredible equipment at their disposal) contributing astrophotography images. JayCubby (talk) 17:24, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support So beautiful! Well labeled, too. Could you add some information about the equipment you use and how long the exposure was? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:20, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 06:46, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Wow! -- Radomianin (talk) 07:19, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Jakubhal 08:13, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2025 at 20:02:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Genus : Connochaetes (Wildebeests and Gnus)
Info Group of hunderts of blue wildebeests (Connochaetes taurinus) arriving in a water hole in Tarangire National Park, Tanzania. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:02, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:02, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 23:20, 12 November 2025 (UTC)- Great shot! What is the thing that looks like a drop of water just to the right of the tree and hill? I'm not asking you to remove it if there's no good reason to do so; I just want to know what it is. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:28, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
- Ikan Kekek: Good spotted and good question, no clue. It was no dust because it would have been 6 times on the image (this panorama image is composed of 6 frames), but it isn't. I removed it. Poco a poco (talk) 06:57, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
- So it could have been kept. Anyway, you have my
Support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:16, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
- So it could have been kept. Anyway, you have my
- Ikan Kekek: Good spotted and good question, no clue. It was no dust because it would have been 6 times on the image (this panorama image is composed of 6 frames), but it isn't. I removed it. Poco a poco (talk) 06:57, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Very interesting. It might be worth adding something to the image description and categories to indicate the presence of the heron, and another bird that I'm not sure I know what it is. Cmao20 (talk) 07:08, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
- I thought of that, too, and tend to agree. Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:57, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
- I added some cats. Poco a poco (talk) 19:19, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:54, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support (ZmajiZmajiZmaji (talk) 12:34, 13 November 2025 (UTC))
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:11, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support An aesthetically pleasing composition, and a strikingly impressive herd. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:23, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 09:13, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2025 at 19:48:49 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Muraenidae_(Moray_Eels)
Info Laced moray (Gymnothorax favagineus), Ad Dimaniyat Islands, Oman. This moray, also called leopard moray eel, can reach a maximum length of 3 metres (9.8 ft). The laced moray lives on the outer slopes of coral reefs and is widespread throughout the Indo-West Pacific area from eastern coast of Africa, Red Sea included, to Papua New Guinea and from southern Japan to the Great Barrier Reef. Note: there are no FPs of this species on Commons. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:48, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:48, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 23:22, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support A good, sharp underwater image, will enhance the gallery of Moray eels. --Tagooty (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 05:10, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful moray and photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:31, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Big wow Cmao20 (talk) 07:07, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support ZmajiZmajiZmaji (talk) 12:40, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:25, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 15:31, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 17:04, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose nice but only part of head near eye is sharp --Gower (talk) 07:49, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2025 at 16:02:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Tunisia (no FPs of Tunisia in this gallery yet, a section will be created if this is promoted)
Info all by me -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 16:02, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Stark and beautiful. I would be inclined to increase the contrast a bit, as the shadows seem a bit flat at the moment, but all personal choice, it's definitely FP for me Cmao20 (talk) 07:06, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support I really like the feel of this, and the light and colors are very believable to me with all those clouds. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:22, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Gower (talk) 07:55, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2025 at 13:08:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Falconidae (Falcons, kestrels and caracaras)
Info No FPs of this species. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:08, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:08, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 13:32, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 23:22, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support High quality, good pose. --Tagooty (talk) 04:30, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Amazing sharpness and nice composition. Is the little diagonal line toward the lower right corner an artifact or something natural? If it's natural, don't do anything to it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:44, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent composition and quality Cmao20 (talk) 07:05, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:07, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:55, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:18, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:20, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:12, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 15:32, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 17:03, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:25, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2025 at 11:43:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Airliners
Info created by MarcelX42 – uploaded by MarcelX42 – nominated by LexKurochkin -- LexKurochkin (talk) 11:43, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- LexKurochkin (talk) 11:43, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --August (talk) 17:05, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 23:22, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cute, something I never thought I'd say about a big airplane. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:38, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Yes, this is quite famous and deserves an FP to illustrate it Cmao20 (talk) 07:05, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:15, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:20, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 13:12, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 17:04, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --EUPBR (talk) 20:16, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 06:46, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Tight crop but o.k.Ermell (talk) 09:16, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2025 at 22:07:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Other_objects_in_landscapes
Info Balancing granite monolith, a 500+ ton geological wonder, in the Ergaki mountain tundra landscape under a broken, apocalyptic sky. Sayan Mountains, Siberia. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 22:07, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Argenberg (talk) 22:07, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --August (talk) 17:04, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support, but it's a little bit noisy. --heylenny (talk/edits) 23:23, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Complex but rewarding composition. I don't think it needs denoising - a fine grain is always preferable to too much NR Cmao20 (talk) 07:03, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support The sitting person shows the enormous dimensions --Llez (talk) 11:19, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 17:03, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent photo of an interesting object. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:09, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Cvmontuy (talk) 01:05, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2025 at 17:24:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Cactaceae
Info created by Petro Stelte – uploaded by Petro Stelte – nominated by Petro Stelte -- Petro Stelte (talk) 17:24, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 17:24, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 21:47, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support A very interesting, clear and simple composition that makes skilful use of the pastel tones of yellow and blue! Additionally it has an almost perfect DoF. --August (talk) 08:48, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Agree that the pastel colours are really nice and the composition is satisfying and pleasant Cmao20 (talk) 07:02, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:13, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support “Nothing special” – and that’s the point. As Weston showed us, a photograph which reveals the subtle beauty of an everyday object and makes it shine is a real achievement. – Aristeas (talk) 19:21, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support per Aristeas' really good argument and also Cmao20's remarks. It's pretty much the perfect shot of this motif. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:24, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:29, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2025 at 14:14:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Tunisia
Info all by me -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 14:14, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Worthy to me, and comparable to photos of the façades of highrises that we've featured. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:00, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 07:17, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:24, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Per Ikan Kekek, an eye-catching facade. --Tagooty (talk) 04:34, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:55, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:12, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:17, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 17:05, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support A superb view of local architecture. Its authenticity and lack of tourist gloss are captivating. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:31, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Impressive. Love the steep stairs leading to the upper storeys and the doors with their varying colours. – Aristeas (talk) 19:08, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2025 at 13:05:30 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Balaenopteridae_(Rorquals)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:05, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:05, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 19:53, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 21:48, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Superb --Ermell (talk) 22:05, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:37, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support per Ermell. Exciting! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:02, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 07:17, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 11:15, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support - Superb! — ERcheck (talk). 23:22, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Strong support Beautiful. - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:09, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:56, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:11, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:16, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 15:33, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 17:06, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:07, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Cvmontuy (talk) 01:06, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2025 at 10:23:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Tunisia
Info The Mosque of the Seven Sleepers is a historic religious site located in Tunisia. It is named after the legend of the Seven Sleepers, a group of young men who, according to Christian and Islamic tradition, sought refuge in a cave to escape persecution and miraculously slept for centuries. The mosque, built near a cave believed to be linked to this story, serves as both a place of worship and a symbol of faith and perseverance. Its simple yet spiritual architecture reflects the harmony between myth, religion, and local culture.
- Created by Skander Zarrad – uploaded by Skander Zarrad – nominated by Hommi2020 -- Hommi2020 (talk) 10:23, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Hommi2020 (talk) 10:23, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment I'd support if the crop at the bottom is improved (getting rid of the pieces of wall) and the vignetting is reduced (better if you crop a chunk of sky, I believe). Poco a poco (talk) 20:40, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
- You're right.
- I've made those small changes.
- Thank you for your advice. Skander zarrad (talk) 23:22, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 07:17, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support I agree that cropping the sky would be beneficial. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:25, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Love the subtle contrast between the white buildings and the beige barren landscape. The leaning, but still standing minaret is impressive. You could crop the sky, if you want, but please not too much, only by 1/5 or so, else the photograph would loose its remarkable feeling of expanse. – Aristeas (talk) 19:05, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support I agree with Aristeas again. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:26, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:29, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment @Skander Zarrad You EXIF (f/1.2 ?) is for portrait, but you still keep all background and so its not focues just on mosque. Isn't than better to make a crop ? --Mile (talk) 10:44, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2025 at 06:28:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Rallidae_(Coots,_Rails_and_Crakes)
Info All by Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:28, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:28, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:22, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 21:52, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:04, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 07:15, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support TheBritinator (talk) 13:04, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Sharp, attractive pose. --Tagooty (talk) 04:50, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:44, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:29, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:08, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:16, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 04:36, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2025 at 22:33:51 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Trochilidae_(Hummingbirds)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:33, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:33, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful photo. But why is an individual from one species displaying to an individual from another? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:05, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
- Both birds are very territorial. A Lesser violetear displays its violet "ears" by flaring the feathers out from the sides of its head. This is usually a threatening gesture, used when the bird is defending its territory or fighting with other hummingbirds. The display is a way to make itself appear larger. The intimidating gestures of the Lesser violetear (which was also moving its wings and tail quickly) worked and the Green-crowned brilliant flew away after a few seconds. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:29, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:37, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Well done Cmao20 (talk) 05:51, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Strong support Wonderful capture. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:32, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support as per Tisha. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:21, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:18, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:21, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 11:06, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 14:24, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Caught an exceptional moment --Tagooty (talk) 15:45, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Info New version uploaded with slight change: shadows lifted (I felt that it was a bit too dark under the Green-crowned brilliant) -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:47, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:42, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 21:50, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:38, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support TheBritinator (talk) 23:16, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 03:26, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 07:41, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Magnificent! --LexKurochkin (talk) 11:17, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:44, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:15, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 15:35, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 18:59, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 04:35, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support superb quality, very beautiful --Gower (talk) 07:57, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2025 at 18:59:36 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Domestic dogs
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 18:59, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Красный wanna talk? 18:59, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, I fail to see something extraordinary here. Poco a poco (talk) 19:27, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose It looks like an act of lawbreaking is being documented here, but be that as it may, I agree with Poco. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:07, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Neutral Looks like an act of breaking some local rule. The sign reads "dog walking is prohibited". LexKurochkin (talk) 12:01, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment I think it's kinda cute and funny, and good image quality, although I'm not sure it is outstanding enough to be FP. It is a nice photo and I like it. Nevertheless, the chromatic aberration on the dog's nose and mouth does need to be corrected. Cmao20 (talk) 05:51, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Thug life dog! --heylenny (talk/edits) 21:53, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose purple fringing, dog is not very sharp, nothing extraordinary except funny law-breaking --Gower (talk) 07:58, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2025 at 18:27:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#France
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 18:27, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 18:27, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:55, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support The tree and the fallen autumn leaves help make this photo special, but this is also a good photo of a chateau with an interesting history that goes back to the 10th century. You might want to link the fr.wikipedia article about it in the file description. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:13, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support per Ikan Cmao20 (talk) 05:49, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Well-balanced composition with an autumn mood that complements the character of the castle. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:14, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:17, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:07, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 21:54, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:42, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:15, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:27, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2025 at 18:25:36 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Palaces#France
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 18:25, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 18:25, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Simple but satisfying Cmao20 (talk) 05:49, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:06, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 21:54, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Very clear photo of a pretty chateau, but to me, this is just a good, pleasant QI, as there's nothing greatly inspiring to me about the picture, though it has nice framing and is viewed looking down a path, so I can definitely understand why it's getting support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:41, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:14, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Works for me thanks to the curved path leading to the building. – Aristeas (talk) 18:58, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:26, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:46, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2025 at 15:08:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Palestine
Info created by Mahmood moutan – uploaded by Mahmood moutan – nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 15:08, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 15:08, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support-Rotana🦋 (talk) 16:23, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Great subject and colours but the it is a bit noisy and blurry on the sides. TheBritinator (talk) 17:14, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Great subject but this shot is far from QI Poco a poco (talk) 19:14, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Yeah, this is far from FP-level for church interiors. Look at the incredible church interior photos we've featured in the last 5-10 years. A sharper photo of this interior would be most welcome. This might be a Valued Image in the right category, though: consider nominating it at COM:VIC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:19, 11 November 2025 (ITC)
Oppose I would also add that the colour balance seems way too cold to me Cmao20 (talk) 05:49, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose significant lack of sharpness --Gower (talk) 07:59, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 09:23, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2025 at 12:53:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Camaenidae
Info created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 12:53, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 12:53, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 14:21, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:01, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 18:32, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:17, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support: phenomenal! JayCubby (talk) 19:53, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:07, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support I love the warm brown bands on the yellow shell – and the even finer dark lines add a subtle extra layer of texture. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:55, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:56, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:48, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful shell. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:24, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:15, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:20, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 11:08, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:50, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Striking colours --Tagooty (talk) 15:47, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:17, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 21:46, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 07:42, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:41, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 17:06, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Gower (talk) 08:00, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2025 at 07:41:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Tunisia
Info created by Skander zarrad – uploaded by Skander zarrad – nominated by Hommi2020 -- Hommi2020 (talk) 07:41, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Hommi2020 (talk) 07:41, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:02, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support TheBritinator (talk) 17:19, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice light and shadows play, works for me Poco a poco (talk) 19:19, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support per Poco, love the light and shadows. Please don't do any further noise reduction, it would make it worse Cmao20 (talk) 19:58, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:48, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:14, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Interesting perspective on the interior of an amphitheatre. – Aristeas (talk) 14:50, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 21:47, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:13, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2025 at 06:32:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures_outdoors
Info Horas de Chumbo is a hidden gem in Lisbon. It's a great mix of art, acoustics and urban flair. The tunnel is an interesting photo opportunity and the echo experience is amazing. Created by Julesvernex2 – uploaded by Julesvernex2 – nominated by Syntaxys -- Syntaxys (talk) 06:32, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support I particularly like the abstraction in this image composition; you don't immediately realise what you're looking at here. -- Syntaxys (talk) 06:32, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment Syntaxys, thank you for the nomination! This is indeed a great sculpture, and Rui Chafes has some other remarkable ones scattered across Europe. I trust you had a chance to explore the rest of Parque das Nações? This was a very different place in the nineties: [1] – previous comment added by Julesvernex2 – Syntaxys
- Oh, my info text was probably misleading; I wasn't there myself. I stumbled across your very interesting picture and did some research for the nomination. But Lisbon is still one of the places I'd like to visit someday. --Syntaxys (talk) 09:53, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Unusual and creative view as I have come to expect from Julesvernex2 Cmao20 (talk) 19:59, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support as per nomination. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:25, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support I guess I'm the only one who finds it obvious I'm looking at a tunnel, but I find the view kind of captivating. My brother wouldn't be surprised: We've always enjoyed tunnels and underpasses that have echoes and light at the end but don't have automobiles in them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:27, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
- Is it a tunnel, though? :) Julesvernex2 (talk) 08:08, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
- It isn't? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:07, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
- It is, albeit a very small one: [2]. The funnelling tricks our eyes into seeing a long straight tunnel. Julesvernex2 (talk) 08:55, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
- I see! Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:29, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
- It is, albeit a very small one: [2]. The funnelling tricks our eyes into seeing a long straight tunnel. Julesvernex2 (talk) 08:55, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
- It isn't? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:07, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
- Is it a tunnel, though? :) Julesvernex2 (talk) 08:08, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support per nomination. – Aristeas (talk) 14:49, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 21:47, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Like Ikan, I also saw it as a tunnel immediately, but I agre wtih Syntaxys, the abstraction is fantastic. —brainandforce [yap] 23:24, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:13, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2025 at 23:51:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Agriculture#Germany
Info I think the muted colours are part of the charm here. Very elegant and painterly photograph for me. created by Aristeas – uploaded by Aristeas – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 23:51, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 23:51, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Nothing special to me, sorry. Perfectly fine as a QI, but no great composition and not painterly to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:59, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- No worries, I fully understand this. Not trying to change your vote, but I'll explain in some more detail why this picture is special to me, for the benefit of other voters. I like the gentle curve of the path from the bottom left that subtly leads the eye towards the horizon. I like the shapes of some of the trees, including the one slightly to the right of middle that looks a bit like a trident. But most of all I like the colours. The contrast between the winter mood of the bare trees and grey frost, and the green grass and rich clods of earth poking their way out from the frost. It feels to me like, even though it's still winter, the world is promising to start coming back to life. I really like that. Cmao20 (talk) 05:51, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 04:57, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support A very beautiful portrait of a typical landscape scene in Kraichgau. It invites you to leave the warm living room and take a walk in the fresh air. --Syntaxys (talk) 06:03, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support I understand that at first glance the image may seem very simple. For me, that quietness is exactly what makes it special: the gentle curve of the path, the soft contrast between frost and earth, and the muted colors remind me of a Caspar David Friedrich painting (e.g., Afternoon, Noon) – calm and understated, yet drawing you in the more you look. A humble scene, captured with care. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:28, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:01, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:02, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I concur with Ikan Kekek. The crop looks random to me. Poco a poco (talk) 19:22, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:12, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:20, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support The colours are special: in a sea of landscapes with perfect warm light, it's refreshing to see that a good photographer can also make due with crappy conditions. I can't see the connection to paintings that others can, but it does remind me of analogue film. Regarding the composition, to my eyes it's not random at all: the path starts at one of the edges and zig-zags across the entire image, and the frame is cropped at equal distance from the two tree trunks. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 18:28, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Thank you very much for the nomination, Cmao20, and thank you all for constructive comments. – Aristeas (talk) 11:38, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin and others. —brainandforce [yap] 22:50, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:39, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support ZmajiZmajiZmaji (talk) 14:13, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:27, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2025 at 23:51:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Switzerland
Info Nice cold mood in a Swiss town square at blue hour. created by Roy Egloff – uploaded by Roy Egloff – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 23:51, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 23:51, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 04:57, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:01, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 14:22, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 18:32, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Neutral Too much uninteresting foreground, otherwise nice Poco a poco (talk) 19:31, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:58, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support For my taste, the image is a bit too "polished" - a touch more grain/noise would have suited it well. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:15, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:47, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:35, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:11, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Very beautiful winter mood. I guess the photographer selected ƒ/18 to get distinct diffraction spikes, but as a side effect this also introduces some diffraction which swallows fine textures. Noise reduction may have increased the effect, but it does not reduce the charm of the scene. – Aristeas (talk) 14:47, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:39, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
- I do agree that the noise reduction has gone a little far, but considering that the image is 38 megapixels in size, I don't think any resulting unsharpness when viewed at full size is too problematic, as the picture still has a huge amount of detail. Anyway, thanks for all reviews everyone Cmao20 (talk) 06:19, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
- Full agreement – my comment was not meant to diminish the photo, I just wanted to find out and explain what’s going on. Sorry if my comment sounded like criticism. – Aristeas (talk) 18:55, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
- I do agree that the noise reduction has gone a little far, but considering that the image is 38 megapixels in size, I don't think any resulting unsharpness when viewed at full size is too problematic, as the picture still has a huge amount of detail. Anyway, thanks for all reviews everyone Cmao20 (talk) 06:19, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2025 at 21:18:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info created and uploaded by Royal Society uploader, nominated by Yann
Support -- Yann (talk) 21:18, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:46, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Good portrait. I was thinking "Dyson vacuum cleaners" and I was like "No, couldn't be." But in fact, this is Sir Dyson Vacuum Cleaners! He literally invented bagless vacuum cleaning! Among other things he's done. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:02, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 12:30, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:00, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:32, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support A strong, well-composed portrait in excellent quality. It offers a clear and personable view of Dyson himself - and, for me, it finally closes the gap between the brand and the person behind it ;) -- Radomianin (talk) 20:49, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:47, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:09, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose A emasculated, formal portrait with a false smile. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:16, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2025 at 15:29:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Ships
Info created and uploaded by Julian Herzog, nominated by Yann
Support -- Yann (talk) 15:29, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:20, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support The subtle quality of light elevates the image beyond mere documentation. -- Radomianin (talk) 23:12, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:46, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Radomianin, you so often cut to the heart of what makes a photo great. I agree 100%. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:04, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you very much, Ikan. I just try to express honestly what I feel in the images. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:03, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 05:05, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:34, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 12:31, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Cart (talk) 12:36, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:59, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment Quite strong halo effect due lifting of the shadows. —kallerna (talk) 13:55, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:03, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Great light and POV Poco a poco (talk) 19:57, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:47, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:38, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:29, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Very good image with nice sky and colours. But I have to oppose due to the halo effect mentioned by Kallerna. --August (talk) 16:35, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:37, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2025 at 15:11:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Walls
Info The downpipe and the broken plaster produce an artistic effect that enriches the composition, but those two elements also make this picture tell a true scientific story. Namely, the wall area around the downpipe cracks faster because of the water ingress, while other wall areas remain relatively intact as they are farther away from the downpipe and less exposed to moisture. Typically, rainfall needs to accumulate over many years so that the damage is made through this effect, which can perhaps be better illustrated through a montage of multiple videos recorded over time, but this picture depicting the resulting damage catches the effect well enough. All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:09, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:09, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:46, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support This is an operating school? Seeing the thumbnail on FPC, I didn't think I'd like this photo, but it is a very good composition and also has pathos. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:06, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- According to the school's website, it's an operating school for pupils in only two out of nine years due to the low number of inhabitants of the village (111 in the 2021 census). --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:09, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 05:06, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Despite modest light, I like the colour palette and the broken plaster revealing the masonry - it gives the facade a raw, honest character. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:15, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:32, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:59, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Underexposed, andIMO not special enough to be among our best. —kallerna (talk) 13:56, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Kallerna: I've uploaded a brighter version by 0.5 EV. How does it look now? --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:35, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks, the exposure is better now. —kallerna (talk) 12:43, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:47, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:35, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 14:37, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:57, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry. I'm not yet able to grasp this Zen. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:49, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --B. Jankuloski (talk) 19:22, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2025 at 14:54:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Tyrol
Info The Grawa-Waterfall in the Stubai Valley, Tyrol, Austria. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 14:54, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 14:54, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:43, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:44, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Impressive view - convincingly captured. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:08, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:46, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 05:06, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful angle of view, and along the lines of Radomianin, I'd say you really captured the dynamism of the water. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:20, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:31, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:58, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:04, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:55, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:45, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:37, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:58, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 17:07, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2025 at 14:07:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Family : Oxyopidae (Lynx Spider)
Info created by Cvmontuy – uploaded by Cvmontuy – nominated by Cvmontuy -- Cvmontuy (talk) 14:07, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cvmontuy (talk) 14:07, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:46, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 03:13, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 05:06, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Question Are you sure about the species? w:Peucetia viridana says it's "a species of spider found in India, Myanmar and Sri Lanka," and the picture in the article looks different from this one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:23, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- I asked Google AI with a screenshot and was told that this is indeed the species ''Peucetia viridans'', along with the information that it also exists in Mexico. Syntaxys (talk) 06:49, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- You’re right — the correct name is Peucetia viridans. I’ve fixed the description and will request a file rename. Thanks! Cvmontuy (talk) 10:42, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you. How big is the spider? The spider is only partly sharp in this one. I think I prefer File:Peucetia viridans, Sierra de Guadalupe, Mexico 20251108p1.jpg as a composition as well as for the spider being sharper. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:33, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
- You’re right — the correct name is Peucetia viridans. I’ve fixed the description and will request a file rename. Thanks! Cvmontuy (talk) 10:42, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- I asked Google AI with a screenshot and was told that this is indeed the species ''Peucetia viridans'', along with the information that it also exists in Mexico. Syntaxys (talk) 06:49, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
-- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:09, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose so as not to get this promoted right away without at least a bit of a discussion here.- The body size is between 1 and 2 cm. I prefer this version because the body is shown completely. Cvmontuy (talk) 09:44, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support That's pretty small. I support on that basis. Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:37, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support OK for me, I confirm that it is indeed Peucetia viridana.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:54, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Although the depth of field is not perfect, I think the image is very well done, as it shows the species in its natural environment and the important details are clearly visible. I would find information about the size of the spider interesting. --Syntaxys (talk) 06:56, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment Cvmontuy, when you move a nom, please remember to replace the file name at all instances on the nom page. Now fixed. Also don't check the create redirect box for the old page, it serves no purpose after a correct move. I've sd-ed it now. --Cart (talk) 12:52, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for the correction, the check box for redirect creation is checked and disable so i was not able to change it --Cvmontuy (talk) 16:47, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:58, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:54, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:45, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:07, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2025 at 11:57:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Genus : Vultur
Info The world's largest bird of prey is a beautiful vulture. The wingspan of some albatross species can be about 10% greater. All by Charlesjsdharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:57, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:57, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:46, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 03:15, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 05:06, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Yes, a striking bird. Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:27, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:30, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:57, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:04, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 18:32, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Not the best wildlife shot I can think of but given the fact that we only have one FP in captivity, this works for me Poco a poco (talk) 19:51, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:36, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Cvmontuy (talk) 11:09, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:33, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:08, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 07:43, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Great quality shot. Background could be nicer and bird could be looking towards the camera. --Polinova (talk) 17:10, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment @Charlesjsharp Tried darker sky, it works much better. --Mile (talk) 09:39, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2025 at 10:33:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Morocco
Info Sunset in the Daya Chiker valley in Taza province, Morocco. Autumn foliage of Black poplar (Populus nigra) glows as light of the setting sun floods the valley. Sheep are following their shepherd home. Daya Chiker is a polje caused by leaching of the limestone strata. Created by Tagooty – uploaded by Tagooty – nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 10:33, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 10:33, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Wonderful light, high resolution and very idyllic with those sheeps and the shepherd. --Milseburg (talk) 14:58, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support per Milseburg.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:39, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:47, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:47, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 05:06, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:29, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:56, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:04, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:45, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:45, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:36, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:19, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support per Milseburg. – Aristeas (talk) 14:32, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Gower (talk) 07:54, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2025 at 02:52:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
Info created by Cacio Murilo via MTur Destinos – uploaded by Sintegrity – nominated by Heylenny -- heylenny (talk/edits) 02:52, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- heylenny (talk/edits) 02:52, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Sintegrity (talk) 15:00, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment Very interesting, but random-looking crop on the right side. File:Pedra do Ingá - Paraíba - Brasil - panoramio.jpg, although showing less of the rock face and in a different color, has a better composition to my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:37, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Alternative
Info Suggested by Ikan Kekek. heylenny (talk/edits) 00:39, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
- I said it had a better composition. I didn't really suggest nominating it as an alt. The other photo has more details in the same area. I'm just not convinced either of these is an FP. Some very important categories might be best represented by VIs, given the choices on Commons at this point. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:37, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2025 at 02:42:20 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Brazil
Info created by Renato Soares via MTur Destinos – first uploaded by Sintegrity, edited and nominated by me -- heylenny (talk/edits) 02:42, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- heylenny (talk/edits) 02:42, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support —brainandforce [yap] 22:43, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:47, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- Can I create a set with this one? I'm not familiar with this option here. heylenny (talk/edits) 11:25, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- You could, but my hunch is that they are not sufficiently different to both be FP Cmao20 (talk) 14:32, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment I feel like I'd like to see the top of the nearest crane. Nice light, clouds, etc. I'm undecided for now. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:39, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:42, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:55, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice shot and interesting composition. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:05, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment There is some cw tilt and it's a bit noisy. Poco a poco (talk) 19:43, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:59, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice mood. IMHO the crops are as good as possible here; including all of the frontmost crane would have resulted in an unbalanced image with too much sky. – Aristeas (talk) 14:35, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2025 at 22:48:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Space_exploration#Telescopes
Info An amateur 8 inch (20 cm) Ritchey–Chrétien telescope imaging under dark skies at Kickapoo Valley Reserve, WI, USA. Created, uploaded, and nominated by brainandforce -- Brainandforce (talk) 22:48, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support We don't have any featured pictures of amateur telescopes in this category. -- Brainandforce (talk) 22:48, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. heylenny (talk/edits) 00:17, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Difficult to take and fine in the preview. Bit in full resolution the technical quality is not good enough for FP, I think. --Milseburg (talk) 15:01, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- Fair, I hadn't seen too many examples of nighttime photography here so I wasn't sure if this would meet FP standards. I'll leave it up for more opinions, and if anyone else wants to have a go at processing the RAW I'm happy to share it. —brainandforce [yap] 22:37, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Very nice idea, however, simply too grainy for what it is, in my opinion Cmao20 (talk) 23:48, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment It would be nice to have a good picture of this telescope. But either take it on day time, or on night time with artificial light. Yann (talk) 08:41, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Alternative
Info Another version of this scene. Brainandforce shared a RAW file with me and I edited it. Uploaded at the request of the author. 'Pinging' previous voters: heylenny, Milseburg, Cmao20 and Yann. --Cart (talk) 21:39, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 21:43, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Still not perfect but FP to me now, well done! Cmao20 (talk) 21:46, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 22:15, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Oh yeah, it's all coming together. Thanks for the process. —brainandforce [yap] 23:21, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Very good scene. --August (talk) 17:01, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Substantial improvement and now good for the difficult circumstances. Many thanks to Cart! – Aristeas (talk) 18:51, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2025 at 22:11:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Italy
Info Designed in 1884 by architect Enrico Azzati, this luxurious hotel was conceived for Leghorn's seaside tourism and hosted illustrious figures such as King Umberto I, Queen Margherita of Savoy and Guglielmo Marconi. The roof of the building, subject to countless modifications over the decades, was substantially redone during the last restoration; this made it possible to enhance the small towers that characterise the top of the hotel, where tradition has it that Guglielmo Marconi carried out some experiments on Telegraphy due to its strategic location. All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:11, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:11, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. heylenny (talk/edits) 00:07, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support In some ways, being able to see a reflection of the entire hotel might be more satisfying, but this is quite good and a solid FP to me, especially with the documentation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:32, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Brainandforce (talk) 02:06, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 14:48, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:01, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:02, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:04, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 16:44, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:38, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:46, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:06, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 18:32, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support I wasn't really amazed by the subject but the detail is great and makes me support Poco a poco (talk) 19:40, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:00, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:45, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2025 at 21:59:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Austria
Info created, uploaded and nominated by FlocciNivis -- FlocciNivis (talk) 21:59, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- FlocciNivis (talk) 21:59, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose That's a really nice fanciful castle of a building, but I don't like it being in shadow while the rest of the picture is so bright. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:35, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose As Ikan Kekek said, the rest of the image is too bright. It's probably fixable though. TheBritinator (talk) 10:37, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support FP to me already but would definitely do with being processed a bit better so that the colours didn't seem so washed-out Cmao20 (talk) 23:45, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Distracting foreground. —kallerna (talk) 13:58, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 19:59, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per both versions, unfavorable light and weird WB --Gower (talk) 07:52, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Alternative
Info I tried to correct the background lighting. @FlocciNivis, Ikan Kekek, TheBritinator, Cmao20, and Kallerna: What do you guys think? heylenny (talk/edits) 05:30, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
- That makes everything darker and bluer. It feels like an improvement, but I doubt that makes the photo an FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:56, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
- The first one is bright, second one is dark. Uh... heylenny (talk/edits) 05:58, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
- The problem is that the subject is dark relative to the rest of the photo, not that the entire photo is too bright or too dark. I doubt that's fixable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:11, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
- I tried to fix that in a new version of the image. Not sure if it is enough though -- FlocciNivis (talk) 19:53, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
- This is working better for me. However, I'm seeing a bunch of dust spots now: one a bit below the upper right corner, 2 fainter ones right near the upper left corner, 3 very faint ones just to the right of the top of the main steeple, 2 more under those, next to the shaft of the steeple, a whole bunch under the clearer one on the upper left...it seems like they are endless, and it looks like a huge job to try to find and eliminate all of them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:53, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
- I tried to fix that in a new version of the image. Not sure if it is enough though -- FlocciNivis (talk) 19:53, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
- The problem is that the subject is dark relative to the rest of the photo, not that the entire photo is too bright or too dark. I doubt that's fixable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:11, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
- The first one is bright, second one is dark. Uh... heylenny (talk/edits) 05:58, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support It would be better if FlocciNivis were to do this themselves from the RAW file, but your edit is quite good and IMO an improvement. Cmao20 (talk) 06:07, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
- I tried to reproduce @Heylenny's changes plus adding more brightness on the subject. Thank you all for your feedback -- FlocciNivis (talk) 19:54, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2025 at 09:21:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Uzbekistan
Info Islam Hoja Minaret outside Itchan-Kala wall, Khiva, Uzbekistan (Минарет Ислам Ходжа, Хива, Islomxoʻja minorasi). My shot. -- Mile (talk) 09:21, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 09:21, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Можда би боје биле природније без поларизатора, али није лоше ни овако како јесте. Сећам се да је пењање на врх тог минарета било прилично скупо (100.000 сома). --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:13, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment Толку само ако купиш карта за сите музеји внатре, а ги има за 3 дена гледање, внатре во зидини. Јас горе и не бев. Со скап ЦПЛ, овај од Marumi MC-CPL, стотка беше, има веома добри резултати. Некни имав ефтин Heliopan, ама не беше ок. А иначе влез во зидини е беспалетн. Значи купвај скапо, да не купваш двапати. И поголем радјиус земиш, да можи и НД филтер да приклајш горе и да не објектив не покрива слика. --Mile (talk) 16:52, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment A very beautiful minaret and an effective composition, but IMHO too dark, especially the sky. That a CPL is a “natural” = non-digital filter does not mean that we must take its effect as natural if it is exaggerated; this photo would look much more natural if you lift the exposure on the sky during the post-processing/raw image development. – Aristeas (talk) 15:19, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment @Aristeas i will use copy-paste, for more check Polarizing filter (photography): “...This allows the natural color and detail of what is beneath to come through. Reflections from a window into a dark interior can be much reduced, allowing it to be seen through. (The same effects are available for vision by using polarizing sunglasses.)”... DeepSeek say: “In conclusion, a C-PL filter gives you direct optical control over light and reflections, allowing you to capture scenes in a way that often more closely matches how your eye perceives them, or to creatively enhance them beyond reality. It's a must-have for landscape, architecture, and travel photographers.”Reddit say:“Is a CPL filter worth it? Circular Polarizer (CPL) filters are a must-have tool for photographers looking to reduce glare, enhance colors, and improve overall image quality. Whether you're shooting landscapes, reflections on water, or through glass, a CPL filter can make a significant difference.” I say: yes, i need it, otherwise i would left it at home. Otherwsie compare colors on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Minaret_of_Islam_Khodja_Madrasa And its still about Minaret and not sky. I increase there than i increase Minaret too. I would not change anything. --Mile (talk) 16:39, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for the explanations, although this was not necessary – I know well about the use of polarizing filters, there are always CPLs for my most-used lenses in my bag and I use them from time to time. And I did not say that you should leave the CPL at home. My point was that while the minarets look clearer thanks to the reduced reflections, the sky gets too dark. There are two ways to cope with this. (1) CPL filters have the advantage that you can vary the strength of the polarization by just turning the filter a little but. Personally I often use CPL filters at a medium setting, so I get clearer colours and a darker sky, but not a too dark one. But if you need to use the CPL at its maximum setting because this is necessary for the proper rendering of the minaret, you can still (2) use a simple mask on the sky to increase its exposure during the post processing/raw image development. This allows you to lift the exposure of the sky until it looks natural without changing the look of the minaret, and this is what I wanted to suggest here. – Aristeas (talk) 18:57, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:46, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose -- There is no such DARK SKY at this time of day. Je-str (talk) 21:19, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose. No 'wow' here. heylenny (talk/edits) 00:05, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment The sky is really dark, but the minaret is really beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:44, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Request To me, the focus here seems to be more on the clay wall than on the minaret - therefore I personally would not support this version. However, you have variants from the same series in your upload list. This one appears considerably more suitable (sharper, better exposure). I would very gladly support this alternative if you would like to add it here. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 10:44, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose The sky is way too dark, sorry. TheBritinator (talk) 12:42, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment Comment of Je-str "There is no such DARK SKY at this time of day.". Well yes it is, you can see it. And some anmials can see this kind too. Just human sight is a bit "rock bottom". But if i would use this filter on water or window, to see thru and skip one part of reflextion, than would be all fine. Well in this you can also say "there is no such view". @Ikan Kekek, Radomianin, i will left as it is. --Mile (talk) 18:21, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Mile I understand the use of a polarizing filter to avoid reflections and improve clarity. If I had to evaluate the minaret alone, I would immediately give it a thumbs up. However, the effect on the color of the sky is counterproductive. It looks like a night sky, but we all have human eyes and they cannot be fooled. That is why I used such strong wording. The image would benefit greatly from brightening the sky. So why not combine the advantages of a polarizing filter with a natural view? - Je-str (talk) 19:33, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- @ Je-str I really dont want "normal" blue here, like this. But i hope you wont spoil when "color filters" are used. Some creativity is nice. --Mile (talk) 09:43, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support I am not really keen on the darkness of the sky either but I still think it deserves a star Cmao20 (talk) 23:52, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:41, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Per above Poco a poco (talk) 19:34, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:07, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2025 at 06:29:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family_:_Crocodylidae_(Crocodiles)
Info All by Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:29, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:29, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose. Dramatic and rare moment, but low quality photo. Backfocus, lost detail, posterized crocodile and horns :(. -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:43, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support That's enough focus, considering the moment it captures. As stated at the top of the page: "A bad picture of a very difficult subject is better than a good picture of an ordinary subject." And this is absolutely not a bad picture: the crocodile is just a bit grainy. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:51, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. heylenny (talk/edits) 05:38, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:59, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support per Ikan. --Yann (talk) 15:09, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support I don't think the quality is really low. It's just a bit noisy, but I always prefer noise to too much noise reduction Cmao20 (talk) 23:44, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose 90 % water, IMO the composition is not special enough to justify for the quality. —kallerna (talk) 14:00, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Agree with George. Capturing the capture would have been a hell of a shot Poco a poco (talk) 20:01, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Per Ikan. Rarity of the shot weighs more to me than technical quality. Moreover, even with very high end cameras, autofocus can easily be tricky in scenarios like this where the subject is camouflaged with the background and when there's many waves moving around the subject -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:42, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support as per Giles' persuasive perspective. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:48, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support A rare action shot, sufficient quality. --Tagooty (talk) 04:42, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support per Tagooty. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:12, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose lack of detail in texture of crocodile --Gower (talk) 07:50, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2025 at 17:01:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Religion#Others; 'Others' can be replaced with 'Sikhism' if featured
Info created by an unknown painter for Sodhi Bhan Singh – uploaded by The Most Comfortable Chair – nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 17:01, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 17:01, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment Very detailed, but are the crops arbitrary? Also, if you want a different featured pictures category, you need to fix it now. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:41, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- I think you mean "featured pictures gallery", and UnpetitproleX is not doing anything wrong here. The 'Sikhism' section doesn't exist yet, but will be created if this is featured. He's very kindly letting us know what religion this image belongs to, making the job easier for us gallery maintainers. ;-) --Cart (talk) 11:44, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, the Sikhism gallery doesn’t yet exist, but would if this is featured. Also, as an aside, @W.carter: I do not prefer gendered pronouns on wikiprojects—it is not a big deal, but if you may use gender neutral ones that would be preferred. I do have a disclaimer on my enwiki talk page regarding this, I will add it here as well. Regardless of that, I do think it is my job to let people know of this preference and not something I expect them to just know, of course. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:28, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, I didn't know about your pronouns. I use "he" for any user I don't know the gender of here on the Wiki-projects. Statistically for users here, it most often true, so nothing personal. I'm called "he" so often, I usually don't react to it. I only get feisty when someone calls me derogatory names because they know I'm a woman. --Cart (talk) 12:35, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, the Sikhism gallery doesn’t yet exist, but would if this is featured. Also, as an aside, @W.carter: I do not prefer gendered pronouns on wikiprojects—it is not a big deal, but if you may use gender neutral ones that would be preferred. I do have a disclaimer on my enwiki talk page regarding this, I will add it here as well. Regardless of that, I do think it is my job to let people know of this preference and not something I expect them to just know, of course. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:28, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: The painting is not perfectly square and the borders are not perfectly straight, so some of the margins of the border have been cropped out, unfortunately. This is the crop that exists at the source. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:34, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- I know it's the same at the source. I don't like the crops and don't think we should feature an incomplete image of this work, so I'm tempted to oppose although it's very impressive. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:32, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- I've decided not to oppose, but I think we should be prepared to delist and replace whenever an excellent photo without part of the painting cropped out is uploaded. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:40, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
- I know it's the same at the source. I don't like the crops and don't think we should feature an incomplete image of this work, so I'm tempted to oppose although it's very impressive. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:32, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- I think you mean "featured pictures gallery", and UnpetitproleX is not doing anything wrong here. The 'Sikhism' section doesn't exist yet, but will be created if this is featured. He's very kindly letting us know what religion this image belongs to, making the job easier for us gallery maintainers. ;-) --Cart (talk) 11:44, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice artwork, good reproduction. --Yann (talk) 23:22, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Excellent reproduction. Agree with Ikan that the cropped borders are a bit unfortunate, hence the “weak”. – Aristeas (talk) 19:03, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support MZaplotnik(talk) 08:28, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 14:42, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Wow, huge file + fascinating details to explore Cmao20 (talk) 23:39, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:38, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:03, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent detail and reproduction --Tagooty (talk) 15:55, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2025 at 15:10:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Thailand
Info created by Don – uploaded by Don| – nominated by WPPilot -- Don (talk) 15:10, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Don (talk) 15:10, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment Gallery fixed, a temple is a religious building. The categories and description also needs to be improved, you know enough to place it in the right WP article, so that shouldn't be any problem for you. --Cart (talk) 11:51, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- Info and categories added per request by the photo's author. Please have a look at what I did and use it as a "cheat sheet" the next time you make a nomination. --Cart (talk) 16:49, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. heylenny (talk/edits) 00:01, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support MZaplotnik(talk) 08:27, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry but although this is a nice dramatic view, the colour noise and artefacts at full size mean I can't support for FP Cmao20 (talk) 23:38, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose A particularly well-chosen perspective. Unfortunately, I have to agree with Cmao20. --August (talk) 16:52, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2025 at 14:25:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phasianidae_(Grouse,_Partridges,_Peafowl,_Pheasants,_Quail,_Turkeys)
Info created by, uploaded by, and nominated by Polinova -- Polinova (talk) 14:25, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Polinova (talk) 14:25, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Request Unfortunately, the image seems slightly out of focus, or a bit blurred, which is quite a pity. Do you have another photo from the series that you could offer as an alternative? -- Radomianin (talk) 21:43, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
- Unfortunately the rest in the series are either similar or the tail is partially behind a branch. There are not very many good photos of Gambel's Quail available on Wikimedia Category:Callipepla gambelii. I believe this may be the only full unobscured profile in good light and decent focus and resolution. I hope this gives it a fairly good "wow factor" that mitigates the slight lack of focus. Polinova (talk) 02:22, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your explanation and for putting things into context - I appreciate your openness and the conversation. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 06:08, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Pretty bird, insufficient image quality for FP, as per Radomianin's remarks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:41, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. heylenny (talk/edits) 00:01, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Great composition, but image quality is borderline at this size Cmao20 (talk) 23:37, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Per Cmao20 size may be low but such clean shots are hard to get. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:44, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:50, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:01, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Weak support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 19:59, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2025 at 13:17:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/United_States#New_Jersey
Info created by Szeremeta – uploaded by Szeremeta – nominated by Szeremeta -- Szeremeta (talk) 13:17, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Szeremeta (talk) 13:17, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Big, detailed picture of Sandy Hook. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:45, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support as per Ikan. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:25, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 23:24, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:54, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:36, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:36, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:58, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 22:11, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2025 at 07:01:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Tunisia
Info created by Skander zarrad – uploaded by Skander zarrad – nominated by Ovva olfa -- Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 07:01, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 07:01, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment I would crop some above. --Mile (talk) 09:25, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
- I don't disagree with you, but it's so minor and in a way I think adds to the composition, so i'll
Support – Szeremeta (talk) 13:08, 6 November 2025 (UTC) - I agree, and I'm also a bit disappointed that most of the top portion is in shadow. Great motif, but maybe should be photographed at a different time for optimal results? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:55, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per Mile and my remarks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:59, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support But agree with crop. Also, there are lots of dust spots at the top. heylenny (talk/edits) 23:30, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- I don't disagree with you, but it's so minor and in a way I think adds to the composition, so i'll
Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:55, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:31, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Disturbing element at bottom right, lots of dust spots, too much sky, disturbing tourists. Sorry, not a FP to me Poco a poco (talk) 20:13, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per Poco a poco, unfixed dust spots are unacceptable --Gower (talk) 07:43, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 08:51, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2025 at 01:31:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Optical devices
Info created by Cvmontuy – uploaded by Cvmontuy – nominated by Cvmontuy -- Cvmontuy (talk) 01:31, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cvmontuy (talk) 01:31, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent lighting and composition. -- Szeremeta (talk) 13:13, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 13:55, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I recognize a good attempt but for an FP nom of a small product image but you need to go further. The background needs to be a uniform white (preferred) that separates the black lenses from the background. Also, each of the lenses or tubes should be clearly identified by the manufacturer’s official name for best use in the Wikis going forward. --GRDN711 (talk) 16:51, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
- The item identification has been done --Cvmontuy (talk) 20:32, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:45, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. A beautiful composition. The enclosed space adds visual depth. It looks more artistic than a boring white background. -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:50, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:30, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Fully agree with George. – Aristeas (talk) 21:14, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:53, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:56, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support heylenny (talk/edits) 23:09, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose The lighting is excellent, and the colour tones create an interesting interplay – a lovely still life overall. However, I think the choice of background – an ordinary shelf – diminishes its uniqueness. The shelf makes the scene rather mundane. After all, the title refers to the lenses themselves, not to a photographer’s household shelf. For that reason, in my view it’s a beautiful image, but not a featured picture. --August (talk) 16:47, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose color noise in dark areas, traces of erasing at the right bottom of the shelf, upper parts not as sharp as bottom --Gower (talk) 08:04, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Sun 09 Nov → Fri 14 Nov Mon 10 Nov → Sat 15 Nov Tue 11 Nov → Sun 16 Nov Wed 12 Nov → Mon 17 Nov Thu 13 Nov → Tue 18 Nov Fri 14 Nov → Wed 19 Nov
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Wed 05 Nov → Fri 14 Nov Thu 06 Nov → Sat 15 Nov Fri 07 Nov → Sun 16 Nov Sat 08 Nov → Mon 17 Nov Sun 09 Nov → Tue 18 Nov Mon 10 Nov → Wed 19 Nov Tue 11 Nov → Thu 20 Nov Wed 12 Nov → Fri 21 Nov Thu 13 Nov → Sat 22 Nov Fri 14 Nov → Sun 23 Nov
Closing a featured picture promotion request
The bot
Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure
Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag featured or not featured – for example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
- Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the com-nom parameter. For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
- If the image is already featured on another Wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
- You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the nominator. For set nominations, use:
== Set Promoted to FP ==
<gallery>
File:XXXXXX.jpg
File:XXXXXX.jpg
</gallery>
{{FPpromotionSet2|YYYYY}}, using the names of the set files instead of the XXXXXX and the title of the set instead of YYYYY. - Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedUploader|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the user who has uploaded the image, if that user is not the same as the nominator. - Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedCreator|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the creator, if the author is a different Commons user than nominator and uploader.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/November 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Closing a delisting request
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
{{FPC-delist-results-reviewed|delist=x|keep=x|neutral=x|delisted=yes/no|sig=~~~~}}
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Ensifera ensifera (22271195865).jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delisted or not delisted
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/November 2025.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes). If the image description page uses the old {{Featured picture}} template, replace it with {{Assessments|featured=2}}.
- Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture must not be removed from the chronological list.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/November 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
