Commons:Quality images candidates

Shortcut

• COM:QIC

↓ Skip to nominations ↓

These are the candidates for becoming quality images. This is not the same thing as featured pictures. If you want informal feedback on your photos, please ask at Commons:Photography critiques.

Purpose

The purpose of quality images is to encourage the people that are the foundation of Commons, the individual users who provide the unique images that expand this collection. While featured pictures identifies the absolute best of all the images loaded into Commons, Quality images sets out to identify and encourage users’ efforts in providing quality images to Commons. Additionally, quality images should be a place to refer other users to when explaining methods for improving an image.

Guidelines

All nominated images should be the work of Commons users.

For nominators

Below are the general guidelines for Quality images; more detailed criteria are available at Image guidelines.

Image page requirements

1. Copyright status. Quality image candidates have to be uploaded to Commons under a suitable license. The full license requirements are at Commons:Copyright tags.
2. Images should comply with all Commons policies and practices, including Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.
3. Quality images shall have a meaningful file name, be properly categorized and have an accurate description on the file page in one or more languages. It is preferred, but not mandatory, to include an English description.
4. No advertisements or signatures in image. Copyright and authorship information of quality images should be located on the image page and may be in the image metadata, but should not interfere with image contents.

Creator

Proposed wording changes to specifically exclude AI generate media from being eligable for QI see discussion

Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible unless the photographer is a Commons user. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.

Technical requirements

More detailed criteria are available at Commons:Image guidelines.

Resolution

Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF) should normally have at least 2 megapixels; reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media. This rule excludes vector graphics (SVG) or computer-generated images that have been constructed with freely-licensed or open software programs as noted in the image's description.

Image quality

Digital images can suffer various problems originating in image capture and processing, such as preventable noise, problems with JPEG compression, lack of information in shadow or highlight areas, or problems with capture of colors. All these issues should be handled correctly.

Composition and lighting

The arrangement of the subject within the image should contribute to the image. Foreground and background objects should not be distracting. Lighting and focus also contribute to the overall result; the subject should be sharp, uncluttered, and well-exposed.

Value

Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects.

How to nominate

Simply add a line of this form at the top of Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list Nominations section:

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description  --~~~~ |}}

The description shouldn't be more than a few words, and please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.

If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below:

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description (by [[User:USERNAME|USERNAME]]) --~~~~ |}}

Note: there is a Gadget, QInominator, which makes nominations quicker. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.

Number of nominations

No more than five images per day can be added by a single nominator.

Note: If possible, for every picture you nominate, please review at least one of the other candidates.

Evaluating images

Any registered user whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits, other than the author and the nominator, can review a nomination. For an easier evaluation you can activate the gadget QICvote

When evaluating images the reviewer should consider the same guidelines as the nominator.

How to review

Carefully review the image. Open it in full resolution, and check if the quality criteria are met.

• If you decide to promote the nomination, change the relevant line from

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}

to

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Promotion|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you liked it. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Promotion and add your signature, possibly with some short comment.

• If you decide to decline the nomination, change the relevant line from

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}

to

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Decline|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you didn't like it. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Decline and add your signature, possibly with a statement of the criteria under which the image failed (you can use titles of section from the guidelines). If there are many problems, please note only 2 or 3 of the most severe, or add multiple problems. When declining a nomination please do explain the reasons on the nominator’s talk page – as a rule, be nice and encouraging! In the message you should give a more detailed explanation of your decision.

Note: Please evaluate the oldest images first.

Good voting practices

Shortcut

• COM:QICGVP

1. Do not have an image moved to consensual review ("Discuss") unless someone else added a vote with which you disagree.
2. If you think the image meets QI criteria, use "Promotion" right away.
3. If you think the image does not meet QI criteria and the issues cannot be solved, use "Decline" right away.
4. If instead you believe that the issues can be solved, leave a comment without changing the status (keep it as Nomination).
5. Do not add new votes under already promoted or declined images if you agree with the decision. The bot checks the date of the last comment, so this only delays the result.
6. If a comment raises an unresolved issue, promoting is generally considered impolite. Only promote if the issue is clearly minor, fixed, or incorrect - and say so briefly. If you’re not sure, add a comment (don't change status). Change to "Discuss" only once conflicting votes appear.

Grace period and promotion

If there are no objections within a period of 2 days (exactly 48 hours) from the first review, the image becomes promoted or fails according to the review it received. If you have objection, just change its status to Discuss and it will be moved to the Consensual review section.

How to execute decision

QICbot automatically handles this 2 days after a decision has been made, and promoted images are cached in Commons:Quality Images/Recently promoted awaiting categorization before their automatic insertion in to appropriate Quality images pages.

If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then consider also nominating the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.

Manual instructions (open only in cases of emergency)

If promoted,

1. Add the image to appropriate group or groups of Quality images page. The image also needs to be added to the associated sub pages, only 3–4 of the newest images should be displayed on the main page.
2. Add {{QualityImage}} template to the bottom of image description page.
3. Move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 2025.
4. Add the template {{File:imagename.jpg}} to the user’s talk page.

If declined,

1. move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 2025.

• Images awaiting review show the nomination outlined in blue.
• Images the reviewer has accepted show the nomination outlined in green
• Images the reviewer has rejected show the nomination outlined in red

Unassessed images (nomination outlined in blue)

Nominated images which have not generated assessments either to promote nor to decline, or a consensus (equal opposition as support in consensual review) after 8 days on this page should be removed from this page without promotion, archived in Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 14 2025 and Category:Unassessed QI candidates added to the image.

Consensual review process

Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.

How to ask for consensual review

To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day.

Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you cannot make a decision, add your comments but leave the candidate on this page.

Consensual review rules

See Commons:Quality images candidates#Rules

Page refresh: purge this page's cache

Nominations

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures will only work on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with:

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 11:57, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

• Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC)
• Please insert a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries
• Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first; many are still unassessed
• If you see terms with which you are unfamiliar, please see explanations at Photography terms

If you are not ready to Promote or Decline an image, you may leave a Comment instead.

If someone else has already promoted or declined an image and you disagree, you may cast an opposite voice or use Discuss — this will move the image to the Community Review section.

If you agree with a previous decision, there is no need to cast the same vote again, as doing so only delays the final closure of the nomination.

Please nominate no more than 5 images per day and try to review on average as many images as you nominate (check here to see how you are doing).

November 14, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: Gable of 10 Olimpijska street, former headquarters building of Siemianowice coal mine; chimney of Ciepłownia Siemianowice in the background --Gower 10:59, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Rail tracks, path Rue du Gros Chêne, in Haubourdin, France --Velvet 09:50, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:53, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rail tracks, Rue Jean Jaurès, in Santes, France --Velvet 09:49, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:53, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Nicolaus Copernicus Monument in Chorzów. --Gower 09:24, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination door lock, graffiti, and blue paint stains on the gate in Siemianowice Śląskie --Gower 09:24, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:45, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chorzów, Park Śląski, sculpture Dziewczyna 83 by Leopold Trybowski --Gower 09:24, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 09:50, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination door lock & graffiti on the gate in Siemianowice Śląskie --Gower 09:24, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 09:50, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Icelandic black-tailed godwit --Hobbyfotowiki 09:22, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality, lacking sharpness a bit but fantastic --Gower 09:27, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Yellow-billed stork --Hobbyfotowiki 08:43, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Great, maybe FP in future? --Gower 09:27, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 82-68 in Tunisia.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. By User:Bill.pix --Ovva olfa 08:38, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: 82-68 in Tunisia.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. By User:Bill.pix --Ovva olfa 08:38, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: 82-68 in Tunisia.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. By User:Bill.pix --Ovva olfa 08:38, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: 82-73 in Tunisia.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. By User:Bill.pix --Ovva olfa 08:38, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: 82-73 in Tunisia.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. By User:Bill.pix --Ovva olfa 08:38, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Good scene. But please remove chromatic aberration. --Augustgeyler 09:45, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Zitting cisticola --Hobbyfotowiki 08:36, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 09:27, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Zapornia akool (Brown Crake) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 08:33, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Zapornia akool (Brown Crake) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 08:33, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Zapornia akool (Brown Crake) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 08:33, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Calidris temminckii (Temminck's Stint) in Bakkhali, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 08:33, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Pdanese 11:49, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Calidris temminckii (Temminck's Stint) in Bakkhali, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 08:33, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Potrait of zitting cisticola --Hobbyfotowiki 08:31, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 09:01, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Red-throated diver --Hobbyfotowiki 08:28, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 09:27, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A male common pochard (Aythya ferina) swimming. --Alexis Lours 08:12, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 08:16, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A female common pochard (Aythya ferina) preening. --Alexis Lours 08:12, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 08:16, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A male common pochard (Aythya ferina) swimming. --Alexis Lours 08:12, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 08:16, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A male common pochard (Aythya ferina) swimming. --Alexis Lours 08:12, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 08:16, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A male common pochard (Aythya ferina) swimming. --Alexis Lours 08:12, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 08:16, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Peacock in the aviary of Sitorai Mokhi Khosa complex, Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 08:07, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Mosaics on the minaret of Turkmen madrasa, Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 08:07, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:21, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Sarrafon street, Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 08:07, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Sarrafon street, Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 08:07, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Manhole covers at Sarrafon street, Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 08:07, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 08:41, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Claudia Gabler at Hausacher Leselenz 2021. By User:Harald Krichel --Augustgeyler 07:57, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Discussion
     Oppose Distracting foreground --Gower 08:14, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
     Comment I disagree. It think foreground was chosen intentionally to give depth and the relation to the audience. --Augustgeyler 08:21, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eurocopter (Airbus Helicopters) EC135 T2+ from Luftrettung at Rostock-Laage Airport. By User:MarcelX42 --Augustgeyler 07:57, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 08:23, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Dadaocheng Summer Festival fireworks show "Golden City Water Ripples" on August 20, 2025. By User:Junyu-K --Augustgeyler 07:57, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Construction site of the Leipzig city harbor, harbor entrance with bridge. By User:Falk2 --Augustgeyler 07:57, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Airbus A300B4-608ST Beluga from Airbus Transport International landing at Hamburg-Finkenwerder. By User:MarcelX42 --Augustgeyler 07:57, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 11:32, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aldabra giant tortoise (Aldabrachelys gigantea), Changuu Island, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:02, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Benjism89 07:06, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Aldabra giant tortoise (Aldabrachelys gigantea), Changuu Island, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:02, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Aldabra giant tortoise (Aldabrachelys gigantea), Changuu Island, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:02, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 07:28, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aldabra giant tortoise (Aldabrachelys gigantea), Changuu Island, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:02, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Benjism89 07:06, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aldabra giant tortoise (Aldabrachelys gigantea), Changuu Island, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:02, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:03, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Beaune (Côte-d'Or, France) - Hôtel-Dieu (former hospital) - The turret --Benjism89 06:56, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:39, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Beaune (Côte-d'Or, France) - Hôtel-Dieu (former hospital) - Roof details seen from the ramparts, at the rear of the Hôtek-Dieu, in late afternoon --Benjism89 06:56, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:15, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Beaune (Côte-d'Or, France) - Hôtel-Dieu (former hospital) - Roof details seen from the ramparts, at the rear of the Hôtek-Dieu, in late afternoon --Benjism89 06:56, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:39, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Beaune (Côte-d'Or, France) - Belfry, also known as Clock Tower --Benjism89 06:56, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 07:03, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Beaune (Côte-d'Or, France) - Market Square --Benjism89 06:56, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 07:03, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial view of the Grand Canyon north of Grand Canyon Village, Arizona, USA --XRay 06:56, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Benjism89 07:03, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from the South Rim of the Grand Canyon, Arizona, USA --XRay 06:56, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Benjism89 07:03, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Manhattan skyline, New York City, New York, USA --XRay 06:56, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 07:03, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:05, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tower of the Ferry Building in San Francisco, California, USA --XRay 06:56, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 07:03, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:05, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dodge Hot Rod on San Diego Avenue, San Diego, California, USA --XRay 06:56, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 08:23, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The ‘Hinnerstädtl’ in Jockgrim (South Palatinate) --Syntaxys 06:53, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 06:58, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The ‘Hinnerstädtl’ in Jockgrim (South Palatinate) --Syntaxys 06:53, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 06:59, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Remote view of Jockgrim (South Palatinate) --Syntaxys 06:53, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:12, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Remote view of Jockgrim (South Palatinate) --Syntaxys 06:53, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:10, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Railway bridge over the Schmerbach near Jockgrim (South Palatinate) --Syntaxys 06:53, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:13, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Knights' Chapel in Haßfurt, aerial view --Ermell 06:35, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 06:55, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial view of Hassfurt --Ermell 06:35, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 06:55, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
    CW tilt --George Chernilevsky 06:55, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
     Done
    Thanks for the hint.--Ermell 07:16, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
    I see version from Nov.08 only --George Chernilevsky 07:20, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality now, thanks --George Chernilevsky 07:21, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial view of Hassfurt --Ermell 06:35, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 06:55, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Memorial plaque in St. Matthew's Protestant Church in Lindenau for those who fell in World War II --Ermell 06:35, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:56, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Interior of the Protestant Church of St. Matthew in Lindenau, district of Bad Colberg-Heldburg, Hildburghausen district --Ermell 06:35, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:57, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Right valve of a American Tiger Lucina. Codakia orbicularis --Llez 06:22, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:30, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 4 - 15 Krämerbrücke, Erfurt --Llez 06:22, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:31, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Krämerbrücke, view from west, Erfurt --Llez 06:22, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:33, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Krämerbrücke, view from west, Erfurt --Llez 06:22, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:33, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: "Azimut" ship in Sviyazhsk. --Mike1979 Russia 06:14, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: "Moskva-29" ship in Sviyazhsk. --Mike1979 Russia 06:14, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: "Valeriy Chkalov" and "Aleksandr Fadeyev" ships in Sviyazhsk. --Mike1979 Russia 06:14, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: "Moskva-130" in Kazan. --Mike1979 Russia 06:14, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: "Gennadiy Kuklev" in Kazan. --Mike1979 Russia 06:14, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Lesser violetear displaying its “ears” to a Green-crowned brilliant in Los Quetzales National Park, Costa Rica --Giles Laurent 06:05, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 06:24, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Humpback whale breaching in Ballena Marine National Park, Costa Rica --Giles Laurent 06:05, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 06:24, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 06:57, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Desert-adapted baby elephants cuddling in Damaraland, Namibia --Giles Laurent 06:05, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 06:24, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 06:57, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lilac-breasted roller in flight in Etosha National Park --Giles Laurent 06:05, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 06:24, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Arc de Triomphe in Paris at night (with PC) --Giles Laurent 06:05, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:50, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Leipzig in Germany-SN, former factory site on Rohrteichstraße --Michielverbeek 05:37, 14 November 2025 (UTC)~
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 06:07, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 06:57, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Leipzig in Germany-SN, Zoo Leipzig sculpture --Michielverbeek 05:37, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 07:29, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Quesitz in Germany-SN, church: Dorfskirche --Michielverbeek 05:37, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Need better crop. Clear white area at bottom --George Chernilevsky 06:52, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
    I have only find the white area in Commons so I have upload the file again  Done --Michielverbeek 08:08, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kasr KhrachfaCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 82-67.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Skander zarrad 05:28, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 06:09, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gasr Beni BarkaCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 83-8.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Skander zarrad 05:28, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 06:09, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 06:58, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kasr KhrachfaCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 82-67.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Skander zarrad 05:28, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 06:09, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kasr KhrachfaCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 82-67.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Skander zarrad 05:28, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 06:09, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Synagogue de la Hara-SriraCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 82-1.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Skander zarrad 05:28, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 08:14, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cap with curled gills of a Laccaria laccata (deceiver, lackluster laccaria) Focus stack of 13 photos.
    --Famberhorst 05:20, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 06:10, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 06:58, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Loose strips of bark from a Vitis vinifera 'Boskoop Glory' blue grape.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:11, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 06:10, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Motor Tanker RIVAGE. ENI 2104768. Location Groote Brekken. Princess Margriet Canal near the lock complex to the IJsselmeer.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:11, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:56, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Meadow in the eastern part of "Urlesbachtal" nature reserve near Humprechtshausen --Plozessor 04:44, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:23, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Maniola jurtina on echinops sphaerocephalus at the Kümmelsee near Steinbach (Ebelsbach) --Plozessor 04:44, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Aesculus x carnea in Schweinfurt city park --Plozessor 04:44, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Memorial for Ulrich von Hutten in Bettenburg landscape park --Plozessor 04:44, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination "Banana lake" in Garstadt bird sanctuary --Plozessor 04:44, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:13, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ratsgymnasium in Bielefeld, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. --Tournasol7 04:03, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:13, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sparrenburg in Bielefeld, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. --Tournasol7 04:03, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:47, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 06:58, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Judoc church in Bielefeld, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. --Tournasol7 04:03, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:24, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Süsterkirche in Bielefeld, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. --Tournasol7 04:03, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:47, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Theater am Alten Markt in Bielefeld, NRW, Germany. --Tournasol7 04:03, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Charlotte Walker speaking at an event on 16 September 2025. --Pangalau 03:30, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Poor processing, loss of detail. Bad result with ISO 6400 --George Chernilevsky 07:09, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Charlotte Walker speaking at an event on 16 September 2025. --Pangalau 03:30, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Poor processing, loss of detail. Bad result with ISO 6400 --George Chernilevsky 07:09, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Charlotte Walker speaking at an event on 16 September 2025. --Pangalau 03:30, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Poor processing, loss of detail. Why ISO 6400? --George Chernilevsky 07:00, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination John David Hill at the September-October 2025 Graduation Ceremonies. --Pangalau 03:30, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry, but this isn't very good due ISO 6400. Even downscaled to 3.4 MP there are artifacts. --Plozessor 04:47, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Air Commodore Grant Fifield at the 2025 Remembrance Day at the National War Memorial, South Australia. --Pangalau 03:30, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:47, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Oppersdorfe's palace in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie 1 --Jacek Halicki 03:13, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:05, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Oppersdorfe's palace in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie 2 --Jacek Halicki 03:13, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:05, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Oppersdorfe's palace in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie3 --Jacek Halicki 03:13, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:49, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Former stable in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie 1 --Jacek Halicki 03:13, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:06, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Former stable in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie 2 --Jacek Halicki 03:13, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:06, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of the Joseph Family Vineyards, a small family-owned producer of Cabernet Sauvignon wines in Alexander Valley, Sonoma County, California. --Frank Schulenburg 03:07, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:15, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 06:58, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination An old barn along West Dry Creek Road across from Capo Creek Winery in Dry Creek Valley, Sonoma County, California --Frank Schulenburg 03:07, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:15, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fall colors along West Dry Crrek Road in front of Lambert Bridge Winery in Sonoma County, California --Frank Schulenburg 03:07, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:16, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: San Ramón Nonato Church, Maracaibo. --Rjcastillo 01:49, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Decorative arts: butterfly figure, Maracaibo. --Rjcastillo 01:49, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:49, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View of Ana Maria Campos Park, Maracaibo. --Rjcastillo 01:49, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Signs in Maracaibo. --Rjcastillo 01:49, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. File name and categorization could probably be improved though. --Plozessor 04:49, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Acoustic shell, Ana María Campos Park, Maracaibo. --Rjcastillo 01:49, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Rúa da Porta Faxeira street, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 01:22, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Efremov - 2025. Picea pungens --Юрий Д.К. 00:58, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Efremov - 2025. Thuja occidentalis --Юрий Д.К. 00:58, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Efremov - 2025. Apples in the City Garden --Юрий Д.К. 00:58, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Efremov - 2025. Dome of the Church of the Archangel Michael --Юрий Д.К. 00:58, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 08:14, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Efremov - 2025. Dome of the Church of the Archangel Michael --Юрий Д.К. 00:58, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:19, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Massa River meandering towards the ocean, Souss Massa Nat'l Park, Morocco --Tagooty 00:48, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination View of Sidi R'bat from the beach. Souss-Massa, Morocco --Tagooty 00:48, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:10, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Old and new buildings, Anraz village, Al Haouz, Morocco --Tagooty 00:48, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:10, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Dust whipped up from the dry bed of reservoir, Ouirgane --Tagooty 00:48, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Cracks in the dry bed of the Yacoub el Mansour reservoir, Ouirgane, Morocco --Tagooty 00:48, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:10, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Previously unassessed. by user:Panpanchik --Lvova 00:09, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Rumyantsev mansion interiors --Lvova 00:09, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Rumyantsev mansion interiors --Lvova 00:09, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:10, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Rumyantsev mansion interiors --Lvova 00:09, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Rumyantsev mansion interiors --Lvova 00:09, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed

November 13, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: Apollo Colonnade in Pavlovsk park, Pavlovsk, Saint Petersburg, Russia. By User:Елена Нечипоренко --Екатерина Борисова 23:29, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Wing of Pavlovsk Palace, Pavlovsk, Saint Petersburg, Russia. By User:Елена Нечипоренко --Екатерина Борисова 23:29, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Spire on the top of listed building in Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:29, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 08:14, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Tower part of listed building (bottom-up view), SAint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:29, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Exterior detail of listed building, SAint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:29, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 01:00, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 82-7 in Tunisia.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Majbri wael 21:56, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Very blurry, sorry. --Екатерина Борисова 03:14, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 82-68 in Tunisia.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Majbri wael 21:56, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination 82-73 in Tunisia.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Majbri wael 21:55, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Pangalau 23:02, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 82-39 in Tunisia.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Majbri wael 21:52, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 08:14, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 82-72 in Tunisia.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Majbri wael 21:50, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Great and very detailed scene. --Augustgeyler 22:23, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Gud Fader på Himmelsbågen in front of tornvillan, Nacka strand, Sweden. Seen from SL ferry on Saltsjön. --OleNeitzel 21:41, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Djurgården ferry (SL route 82) moored in front of a skyline of Gröna Lund rides. Stockholm, Sweden. --OleNeitzel 21:41, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Please check the verticals. --Ermell 23:15, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Mosebacke Triumfbåge in front of Södra Teatern (at Mosebacke torg) in Södermalm, Stockholm, Sweden. --OleNeitzel 21:41, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 23:25, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stationslyktan of Katarina brandstation at night. Tjärhovsgatan 9–11 in Södermalm, Stockholm, Sweden. --OleNeitzel 21:41, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Not sharp to me. --Sebring12Hrs 23:35, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saltsjön, Stadsgården, Stadsgårdsterminalen and Slussen Bussterminal on Södermalm, Stockholm, Sweden. View from Katarinahissen. --OleNeitzel 21:41, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --E bailey 01:36, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Façade detail of the 3K Europa hotel, Avenida da República, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 20:58, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Very good quality. --Lmbuga 21:18, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Façade detail of the 3K Europa hotel, Avenida da República, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 20:58, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Incredible depth of field. --Lmbuga 21:16, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Convento de Nossa Senhora da Penha de França wrapped in fog at sunrise, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 20:58, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 21:16, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cicada exuviae on tree bark, Parque Florestal de Monsanto, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 20:58, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Impressive. impressionante --Lmbuga 21:10, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cicada exuviae on tree bark, Parque Florestal de Monsanto, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 20:58, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 21:10, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Apartment building, the 2-nd Moskovskaya Street, 59, Serpukhov --Никонико962 20:44, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 21:01, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Apartment building, the 2-nd Moskovskaya Street, 63, Serpukhov --Никонико962 20:44, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 21:01, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Apartment building, the 2-nd Moskovskaya Street, 51, Serpukhov --Никонико962 20:44, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 21:01, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Apartment building, the 2-nd Moskovskaya Street, 33, Serpukhov --Никонико962 20:44, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 21:01, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Apartment building, Sovetskaya Street, 18, Serpukhov --Никонико962 20:44, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 21:01, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Denza Z9 GT at IAA 2025 --Alexander-93 19:01, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 01:00, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Audi Q3 FJ at IAA 2025 --Alexander-93 19:01, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination New Mayor of Aachen, Michael Ziemons --Grunpfnul 18:59, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality IMO. --Lmbuga 19:04, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination New Mayor of Aachen, Michael Ziemons --Grunpfnul 18:59, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Blown out areas, but I like it --Lmbuga 19:03, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A double-crested cormorant in breeding plumage in Davis, California --Polinova 18:04, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Pdanese 19:06, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A double-crested cormorant in breeding plumage in Davis, California --Polinova 18:04, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 18:11, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A double-crested cormorant in breeding plumage in Davis, California --Polinova 18:04, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose The extremely blurred beak of the bird in the centre of the image is very distracting, sorry. --Lmbuga 18:54, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chorzów, Silesian Park, outdoor sculpture Kwiaciarka by Czesław Dukat --Gower 18:02, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 18:28, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Siemianowice Śląskie, wooden boards covered with paint, garage door --Gower 18:02, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Siemianowice Śląskie, old sxpanded polystyrene wall insulation of a metal garage --Gower 18:02, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Very unsharp, nothing is in focus. Sorry. --Екатерина Борисова 03:17, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chorzów, Silesian Park, surface of the lower part of the outdoor sculpture Kwiaciarka by Czesław Dukat, glazed ceramics --Gower 18:02, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:43, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A Marsh Orchid in the Pupplinger Au. --FlocciNivis 17:57, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 18:15, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Graffiti on a bungalow of the Sanatorio de Abona in Arico, Tenerife, Spain --FlocciNivis 17:57, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 18:26, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The former roundabout at the Salmon colored building at the Punta de los Abrigos in Arico, Tenerife, Spain --FlocciNivis 17:57, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 18:20, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from the South through the Calle Isla del Hierro in Icod de los Vinos, Tenerife, Spain --FlocciNivis 17:57, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
    It's good, but the plant in the foreground should be shown in its entirety (composition). --Lmbuga 18:20, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose For the reasons stated above --Lmbuga 18:21, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Deoxyribose in the Replica of the DNA double helix model by Watson and Crick in the Berlin Museum of Medical History, Germany --FlocciNivis 17:57, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose I don't see anything really focused. --Lmbuga 18:25, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Acura ILX in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 17:40, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. S5A-0043 08:26, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Hyundai Ioniq 5 N in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 17:40, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Honda HR-V in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 17:40, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --E bailey 01:36, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Passenger cabin of a Cessna Citation XLS+ at EBACE 2019 --MB-one 17:38, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 17:42, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 20. Damgartener Badewannenrennen --MB-one 17:38, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 17:54, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kimera Evo 37 at Geneva International Motor Show 2024 --MB-one 17:38, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 17:52, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sunset over Rio Paraíba in Cabedelo, Brazil --MB-one 17:38, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Green reflection of the sun (I think) almost in the centre of the image --Lmbuga 17:49, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
    If you wish, I don't think it would be difficult for me to remove it.--Lmbuga 18:05, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Road construction in Sabir, Azerbaijan --MB-one 17:38, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    The quality is good, but there are two problems: Dust spot (barely noticeable) to the left of the “Socar” sign. It might be worth checking the perspective. --Lmbuga 17:47, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A dark-bellied cinclodes in Puerto Natales, Chile --Polinova 17:30, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Very sorry. It's close, but focus on the eye is not sharp enough --Pdanese 20:00, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Galeras Park, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 17:29, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Nice but sky is absent. --Gower 20:22, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Galeras Park, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 17:27, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 20:22, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Christ crucified, the church of María Salomé, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia Spain. --Lmbuga 16:13, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Looka like tilted to the left. --Екатерина Борисова 03:19, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Double-crested cormorant, Beaver Brook Open Space, Wethersfield, CT USA --Pdanese 13:29, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Polinova 18:12, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Grasshopper sparrow, Suffield Wildlife Management Area, Suffield, CT USA --Pdanese 13:29, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    @Pdanese: blue fringing to reduction. --Gower 20:22, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Yellow-rumped warbler, South Meadows Trail, East Hartford, CT USA --Pdanese 13:29, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 14:39, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Canada goose, Wethersfield Cove, Wethersfield, CT USA --Pdanese 13:29, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 14:39, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination White-throated sparrow, bathing, South Meadows Trail, East Hartford, CT USA --Pdanese 13:29, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 14:40, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 65 Kłodzka Street in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie 1 by User:Jacek Halicki--~~~~
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 14:45, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 65 Kłodzka Street in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie 2 by User:Jacek Halicki--~~~~
  • Promotion
     Support Very good perspective. --Augustgeyler 12:52, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 14:45, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 65 Kłodzka Street in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie 3 by User:Jacek Halicki--~~~~
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 14:45, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 20 Kłodzka Street in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie by User:Jacek Halicki--~~~~
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 14:48, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Oppersdorfe's palace in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie by User:Jacek Halicki--~~~~
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 12:52, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2007 Porsche 911 Carrera S --TTTNIS 11:10, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Rear view of 2007 Porsche 911 Carrera S --TTTNIS 11:10, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: 2018 Porsche 911 Carrera S --TTTNIS 11:10, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Rear view of 2018 Porsche 911 Carrera S --TTTNIS 11:10, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Rear view of 2019 Honda Shuttle Hybrid X --TTTNIS 11:10, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Window of the guesthouse of Sitorai Mokhi Khosa complex, Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 10:40, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Inside gates of Sitorai Mokhi Khosa complex, Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 10:40, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Mosaics on the inside gates of Sitorai Mokhi Khosa complex, Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 10:40, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    I'd suggest to crop the right side a bit, otherwise good (торчит темный кусок облупившейся стены, немного некрасиво). --Екатерина Борисова 03:25, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Gable of inside gates of Sitorai Mokhi Khosa complex, Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 10:40, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Dust spots on the sky to erase. --Gower 20:15, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Inside gates of Sitorai Mokhi Khosa complex, Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 10:40, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 20:15, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Said Sholikorboy Complex, Khiva, Khorezm, Uzbekistan --Panpanchik 10:32, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose One of the street lights covers part of the minaret, I think it could have been expressed differently --Gower 10:43, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Muhammad Aminxon Medrese. Khorezm, Uzbekistan --Panpanchik 10:32, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 10:43, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Juma Mosque, Khiva, Khorezm, uzbekistan --Panpanchik 10:32, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 10:43, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Islomkhoja Madrasah and Tower --Panpanchik 10:32, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 10:43, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Abdolbobo Mausoleum, Khiva, Khorezm --Panpanchik 10:32, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Gate is tilted, it is leaning on site? --Gower 10:43, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A black-headed gull (Chroicocephalus ridibundus) swimming on a foggy day. --Alexis Lours 09:49, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:56, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A female common pochard (Aythya ferina) swimming. --Alexis Lours 09:49, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. You've spoiled me with your perfect photos. This picture is QI IMO, but the eyes don't have the perfection that most of your photos have. --Lmbuga 14:55, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A leucistic Eurasian coot (Fulica atra) swimming. --Alexis Lours 09:49, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Very good quality. --Gower 10:38, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A male tufted duck (Aythya fuligula) swimming. --Alexis Lours 09:49, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Brihaspati 10:07, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Brihaspati 10:11, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A male tufted duck (Aythya fuligula) swimming. --Alexis Lours 09:49, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 10:38, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A picture of Moez Kassam. By User:Mbolz --Gower 09:12, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
    This image looks down-scaled. Please provide a non down-scaled version. --Augustgeyler 09:14, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
    That editor made only 2 edits in 2015… --Gower 10:26, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Unfortunately, as we can't do anything about it, I have to oppose because it is a down-scaled image. --Augustgeyler 10:32, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rhododendron flowers in the Carpathian Mountains, Carpathian National Nature Park, Ukraine. By User:Misha Reme --Augustgeyler 08:27, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Pdanese 12:51, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Corridor with vaulted ceiling at New Town Hall in Leipzig. --Augustgeyler 08:27, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Noticeable color noise as for ISO 200. --Gower 10:45, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
     Done I tried to reduce the noise. It comes from exposure correction in post, when I hat to balance the very bright light with the relatively dark room. --Augustgeyler 15:00, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
    Thanks for noise reduction, but I'm still not convinced if it's QI quality. Let others decide. --Gower 20:10, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
     OK, let's see more opinions --Augustgeyler 08:35, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lockheed Martin C-130J-30 Hercules from Luftwaffe at Hanover-Langenhagen. By User:MarcelX42 --Augustgeyler 08:27, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support High quality and, I think, potential FP --LexKurochkin 08:33, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Airbus A320-214(WL) from Lufthansa at Hanover-Langenhagen. By User:MarcelX42 --Augustgeyler 08:27, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Very good quality. --Gower 20:22, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Path under the M341, Rue Jean Jaurès, in Santes, France --Velvet 08:13, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:22, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rail tracks along the path Rue Jean Jaurès, in Santes, France --Velvet 08:12, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    @Velvet: , good, one spot to remove, I added imagenote --Gower 09:16, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
     Done Thank you for the hint. --Velvet 12:59, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:58, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial view of the Grand Canyon north of Grand Canyon Village, Arizona, USA --XRay 07:14, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 10:38, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from the South Rim of the Grand Canyon, Arizona, USA --XRay 07:14, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:59, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination High-rise buildings on South Grand Avenue, Los Angeles, USA --XRay 07:14, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:56, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Corner of Greenwich Street and Battery Place, New York City, New York, USA --XRay 07:14, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:59, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Catholic Church of the Immaculate Conception on San Diego Avenue, San Diego, California, USA --XRay 07:14, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:59, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Autun (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Ruins from the ancient Roman temple of Janus --Benjism89 07:00, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 07:16, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Autun (Saône-et-Loire, France) - View of the old town from the ancient Roman temple of Janus --Benjism89 07:00, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Beaune (Côte-d'Or, France) - Hôtel-Dieu (former hospital) - Main facade --Benjism89 07:00, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:57, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Beaune (Côte-d'Or, France) - Hôtel-Dieu (former hospital) - Part of the main facade and the turret --Benjism89 07:00, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:57, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Beaune (Côte-d'Or, France) - Hôtel-Dieu (former hospital) - Main entrance --Benjism89 07:00, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    PC needed. --Gower 09:16, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
    I had actually completely forgotten to process this one, this was just the export from the unedited RAW ... sorry, just uploaded new version ! --Benjism89 17:33, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grey-capped social weaver (Pseudonigrita arnaudi), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 06:50, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 07:16, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grey-capped social weaver (Pseudonigrita arnaudi), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 06:50, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 07:16, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Northern red-billed hornbill (Tockus erythrorhynchus), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 06:50, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Northern red-billed hornbill (Tockus erythrorhynchus), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 06:50, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Northern red-billed hornbill (Tockus erythrorhynchus), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 06:50, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Good, but purple fringing could be reduced. --Gower 09:16, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
    I see nothing. Sorry. Can you enlighten me, please? --Poco a poco 19:25, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
    @Poco a poco: look at the grass (lower left corner) and feathers when white are contrasting with black. --Gower 20:04, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: An autumn leaf on a white granite floor in Madrid. --Earth605 06:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
     Oppose Too shallow DoF for me due f / 1,8 --Gower 10:38, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
    Gower It is on purpose. --Earth605 19:29, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Baptismal font of the Protestant Church of St. Matthew in Lindenau --Ermell 06:29, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Earth605 06:37, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Organ loft of the Protestant Church of St. Matthew in Lindenau --Ermell 06:29, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:40, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Residential building in Tokyo with a parked Daimler Sovereign --Ermell 06:29, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Good, but too tight crop at the bottom. Tires are cut. --Gower 10:38, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of Mary in the Catholic branch church of St. Anna in Priegendorf --Ermell 06:29, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Earth605 06:37, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of Jesus in the Catholic branch church of St. Anna in Priegendorf --Ermell 06:29, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Earth605 06:37, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hunnecum-NL, windmill: the molen van Hunnecum --Michielverbeek 06:15, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 07:02, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Puth-NL, church: the Petrus Canisiuskerk --Michielverbeek 06:15, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 20:22, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Munstergeleen-NL, church: the Sint-Pancratiuskerk --Michielverbeek 06:15, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Sharpness on the tower's roof is deteriorating. --Gower 20:22, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Building at Maximilianstraße 39 in Mindelheim, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:59, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:54, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Building at Pfarrstraße 1 in Mindelheim, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:59, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:54, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gruftkapelle in Mindelheim, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:59, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:47, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hungerturm in Mindelheim, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:59, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:17, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Oberes Tor in Mindelheim, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:59, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Earth605 06:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Left valve of a Japan Venus, Marcia japonica --Llez 05:50, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:25, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Krämerbrücke, view from west, Erfurt --Llez 05:50, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:38, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Krämerbrücke, view from east, Erfurt --Llez 05:50, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:19, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from the Rathausbrücke (Town Hall Bridge) towards the houses 19 - 24 Krämerbrücke, Erfurt --Llez 05:50, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:40, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chhatra (topmost part) of Shanti Stupa, Dhauli, Odisha, India. --Brihaspati 05:41, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:26, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Earth605 06:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Argya malcolmi (Large Grey Babbler) in Saswad, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 05:33, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Earth605 06:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Argya malcolmi (Large Grey Babbler) in Saswad, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 05:33, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Earth605 06:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Argya malcolmi (Large Grey Babbler) in Saswad, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 05:33, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Earth605 06:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Argya malcolmi (Large Grey Babbler) in Saswad, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 05:33, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Earth605 06:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Argya malcolmi (Large Grey Babbler) in Saswad, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 05:33, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Brihaspati 05:41, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Coprinellus disseminatus
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:07, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 05:56, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Flowering heather in heathland in Groote Zand nature reserve in Hooghalen Forestry.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:07, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 05:56, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: AmphithéâtreCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 53-3.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Skander zarrad 04:55, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    High grain on the sky as ISO 250 and pity that bottom is cut. --Gower 10:38, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gasr Beni BarkaCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 83-8.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Skander zarrad 04:55, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. In my opinion this composition has too much sky, but still QI. --Augustgeyler 08:40, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gasr Beni BarkaCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 83-8.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Skander zarrad 04:55, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality, not very sharp but acceptable --Gower 10:38, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gasr Beni BarkaCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 83-8.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Skander zarrad 04:55, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Portal of Weißenbrunn castle --Plozessor 03:52, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:13, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rock in the former "Eichelberg" quarry near Burgpreppach --Plozessor 03:52, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 05:52, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stained-glass window over the southern portal of the Church of Christ in Haßfurt --Plozessor 03:52, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:56, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from the gallery in Augsfeld parish church --Plozessor 03:52, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment Very good, but perspective correction necessary (see the windows left and right, they are leaning in) --Llez 05:54, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
    @Llez: Actually no, the windows aren't leaning in, the outside walls are leaning in reality. Check the inner side of the window frames or the pulpit. --Plozessor 12:31, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
    If it's due to the building's construction, the picture is OK. --Llez 15:42, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination "Service tree at the middle wayside shrine" natural monument near Grettstadt --Plozessor 03:52, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:56, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Joe Szakacs at the 2025 Remembrance Day at the National War Memorial, South Australia --Pangalau 02:43, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 05:13, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Joe Szakacs at the 2025 Remembrance Day at the National War Memorial, South Australia --Pangalau 02:43, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:54, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vincent Tarzia at the 2025 Remembrance Day at the National War Memorial, South Australia --Pangalau 02:43, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:54, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vincent Tarzia at the 2025 Remembrance Day at the National War Memorial, South Australia --Pangalau 02:43, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:12, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Anne Ruston at the 2025 Remembrance Day at the National War Memorial, South Australia --Pangalau 02:43, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Do such photos of politicians need a PR template? --Tagooty 03:03, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chicken and vegetable tagine, served on a platter, Rabat, Morocco --Tagooty 02:16, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:20, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sunrise, Sidi Rabat, Morocco --Tagooty 02:16, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:10, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Entrance to Sidi R'bat on RP1018, Souss-Massa, Morocco --Tagooty 02:16, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:18, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Path along the Massa River, Souss Mass National Park --Tagooty 02:16, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Nice composition. --Augustgeyler 08:40, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Juvenile (left) and adult (right) Greater flamingos (Phoenicopterus roseus) bottom feeding, Massa River, Morocco --Tagooty 02:16, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Not very sharp. --Earth605 06:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wojciech Sanatorium in Lądek-Zdrój --Jacek Halicki 02:13, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:17, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wojciech Sanatorium in Lądek-Zdrój, the "Solidarność" inscription painted over --Jacek Halicki 02:13, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 10:38, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of Saint John the Baptist in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie 1 --Jacek Halicki 02:13, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:54, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of Saint John the Baptist in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie 2 --Jacek Halicki 02:13, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 20:22, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of Saint John the Baptist in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie 3 --Jacek Halicki 02:13, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:55, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Early October fall foliage from The Overlook in Charlton --PeterCooperJr 01:40, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:55, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination An element of a door in Rumyantsev mansion --Lvova 00:01, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:18, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chandelier in Rumyantsev mansion --Lvova 00:01, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:18, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A ceiling in Rumyantsev mansion --Lvova 00:01, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:18, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: An element of a window in Rumyantsev mansion --Lvova 00:01, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Oak ceiling in Rumyantsev mansion --Lvova 00:01, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:18, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

November 12, 2025

• 
  • Nomination Residential building in Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:55, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
     Oppose Some CAs, bit blurred, not sharp. --Earth605 06:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
     Comment In my opinion, the objections are not grounds for rejection, as the image could be improved. I do not see any obvious CAs, but I do see a slight need for perspective correction.--Lmbuga 19:45, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
    There's no any CA's, but at the second glance I found out that the image really isn't sharp enough. So  I withdraw my nomination. -- Екатерина Борисова 03:34, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Window of Post Office building in Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:55, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Tilted cw, otherwise good --Tagooty 03:08, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
     Done Tried to fix. --Екатерина Борисова 03:30, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
    CW tilt still visible --Tagooty 03:58, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination School No416 in Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:55, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Earth605 06:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Old gates in Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:55, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:08, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rose in Private Dacha park, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:55, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Not sharp enough. --Brihaspati 05:42, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 82-82 in Tunisia.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Majbri wael 21:51, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Too tight crop at bottom to me. --Gower 10:38, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
    Also PC needed. --Екатерина Борисова 03:36, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 82-86 in Tunisia.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Majbri wael 21:50, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Earth605 06:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 82-75 in Tunisia.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Majbri wael 21:49, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    I am not convinced with that composition with plam tree, it's not the main subject and dominates the view and determinates vertical framing. --Gower 10:38, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 82-87 in Tunisia.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Majbri wael 21:47, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:10, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 82-39 in Tunisia.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Majbri wael 21:46, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:35, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Slussen, Stockholm, Sweden. View from Katarinahissen. Gamla stan (Munkbroleden, Kornhamntorget, Tyska kyrkan, Storkyrkan), Riddarholm (Riddarholmskyrkan) and Stockholms stadshus in the background. --OleNeitzel 21:35, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Very detailed and sharp shot. --Augustgeyler 08:40, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Söderström in front of Munkbroleden and Kornhamstorg at Gamla Stan, Stockholm. In the background: Norra tornen (Vasastaden), Klara kyrka (Norrmalm), Storkyrkan (Gamla Stan). View from Katarinahissen, Södermalm. --OleNeitzel 21:35, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JackyM59 08:06, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gamla Stan tunnelbanestation, Centralbron, Riddarfjärden, Stadshus, Riddarholmskyrkan and Norra tornen, Stockholm, Sweden. View from Katarinahissen, Södermalm. --OleNeitzel 21:35, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Skander zarrad 04:56, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Impressive old buildings at Nygränd, Brunnsgränd, Skeppsbron seen from Strömmen. Skeppsbron (Swedish: "The Ship's Bridge") is both a street and a quay in Gamla stan, the old town of Stockholm, capital of Sweden. --OleNeitzel 21:35, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    CAs should be reduced/removed and PC should be done. --Sebring12Hrs 21:43, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Danvikshem retirement home at Nacka, Sweden. Seen from Saltsjön bay. --OleNeitzel 21:35, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose It seems the picture has been compressed a lot. In addition, PC is needed, and there are some purple CAs --Sebring12Hrs 21:42, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ciepłownia Siemianowice, widok z dronaJa, właściciel praw autorskich do tego dzieła, udostępniam je na poniższej licencji --Gower 19:10, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Not very sharp to me, but could be useful at VIC. --Sebring12Hrs 19:32, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Solna Jama cave, pond at the end of the cave --Gower 19:10, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 19:21, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination black paint streak (dripping paint) on the garage door in Siemianowice Śląskie --Gower 19:10, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose It's not just noise. Not the right texture for QI IMO. --Lmbuga 19:19, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Solna Jama cave, central part, view towards the entrance (purple light) --Gower 19:10, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 19:20, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Siemianowice Śląskie, cameras on the Technolux building, Kopalniana street --Gower 19:10, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Quite noisy. Otherwise good --MB-one 07:16, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tiles on As Galeras Street, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 18:09, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:23, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Salmon colored building at the Punta de los Abrigos --FlocciNivis 17:12, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    QI in my opinion and good picture, but there is a spot on the right side (almost at the edge), just above the horizon. Vignetting? --Lmbuga 17:40, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
    I added a note ;) --Sebring12Hrs 17:51, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
    I removed the dust spot --FlocciNivis 20:13, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Pdanese 23:36, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 08:06, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from Abades uphill to the church of the ruined Sanatorio de Abona in Arico, Tenerife, Spain --FlocciNivis 17:12, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Several dust spots. Vignetting. The spots are stuck to the top edge. --Lmbuga 17:46, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
    I removed the dust spot --FlocciNivis 20:17, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 08:06, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Inn-loop in Mühldorf am Inn --FlocciNivis 17:12, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality and nice. --Lmbuga 17:50, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 17:52, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The sculpture Nomade by Gustavo Aceves in Mainz and behind it the Rhine --FlocciNivis 17:12, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose A truly beautiful composition, but unfortunately the sculpture is not in focus. --Augustgeyler 17:52, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Bergehalde Grühlingstraße with a puddle in front --FlocciNivis 17:12, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Ok --Poco a poco 21:25, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Nissan Leaf (ZE2) at autoMOBIL Tübingen 2025 --Alexander-93 16:47, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Blacks clipped. --Gower 07:02, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tesla Model Y Performance at autoMOBIL Tübingen 2025 --Alexander-93 16:47, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Skander zarrad 04:56, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Polish search and rescue boat Pasat in the port of Świnoujście --MB-one 16:40, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 16:52, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Warning sign and advertising for fibre based internet acces on utility poles in Nairobi --MB-one 16:40, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 16:48, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Alpina B3 3.0 at Techno-Classica 2025 --MB-one 16:40, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Distracting surrounding, especially man on the right. --Gower 07:02, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 1st Mercedes-Benz eCitaro G bus in operation with ESWE in Wiesbaden --MB-one 16:40, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Too much foreground but ok --Poco a poco 21:25, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Votive altars. Santa Baia de Logrosa. Negreira. Museum of the Galician People, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 16:37, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:41, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Opel Mokka B at autoMOBIL Tübingen 2025 --Alexander-93 16:27, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Earth605 06:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination MG Cyberster at autoMOBIL Tübingen 2025 --Alexander-93 16:27, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Earth605 06:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cupra Tavascan VZ at autoMOBIL Tübingen 2025 --Alexander-93 16:27, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Earth605 06:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chapelle funéraire de la famille Houtart à Jumet-Heigne --Jmh2o 15:34, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 16:02, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cedar waxwing, Gay City State Park, Hebron, CT USA --Pdanese 13:14, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 14:41, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Juvenile Cedar Waxwing, Glastonbury, CT USA --Pdanese 13:14, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 14:41, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cedar waxwing, Gay City State Park, Hebron, CT USA --Pdanese 13:14, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Nice and good, but the picture has been too sharpened IMO --Lmbuga 15:57, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support I don't see that as a problem... --Earth605 06:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
    @Earth605: Thank you for stepping on me! --Lmbuga 15:04, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cedar waxwings, Gay City State Park, Hebron, CT USA --Pdanese 13:14, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Earth605 06:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cedar waxwing, Gay City State Park, Hebron, CT USA --Pdanese 13:14, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 15:59, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination "Flooded crypt beneath Winchester Cathedral, featuring Anthony Gormley's `Sound II`, illuminated with warm yellow lighting reflecting off the water --Davekern 12:32, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. And really beautiful --JackyM59 12:46, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wojciech Sanatorium in Lądek-Zdrój 1 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 12:24, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 14:07, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wojciech Sanatorium in Lądek-Zdrój 2 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 12:24, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 17:41, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wojciech Sanatorium in Lądek-Zdrój 3 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 12:24, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 16:09, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wojciech Sanatorium in Lądek-Zdrój 4 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 12:24, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 16:09, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wojciech Sanatorium in Lądek-Zdrój 5 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 12:24, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 17:41, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination La Fontaine de la Place d'Armes de Douai --JackyM59 10:37, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    The image is  Underexposed. Fixable? --Augustgeyler 10:44, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
    Exposure correction made --JackyM59 11:01, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
    The exposure is improved. However, the bright sky still causes the dominant foreground to be slightly underexposed. I would recommend using a graduated neutral density filter to prevent the sky from blowing out while allowing for a brighter exposure in the foreground. --Augustgeyler 11:14, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
    Thanks for the advice. I edited the photo with RawTherapee to improve the lighting and also to keep the gold flag at the very top of the belfry. --JackyM59 11:55, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. Well done! --Augustgeyler 12:30, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Half-timbered barn in Lindenau --Ermell 09:35, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    @Ermell: , very good, slight purple fringing can be reduced --Gower 11:26, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
     Comment No problem with those very little purple fringes, but I don't like the blurred area in the foreground (ground and facade). I will add a note this evening. --Sebring12Hrs 12:12, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
    I added the note. --Sebring12Hrs 17:23, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Memorial plaque --Ermell 09:35, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:37, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grave cross at St. Matthew's Protestant Church in Lindenau --Ermell 09:35, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:37, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grave cross at St. Matthew's Protestant Church in Lindenau --Ermell 09:35, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:37, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gravestone at St. Matthew's Protestant Church in Lindenau --Ermell 09:35, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality and interesting epitaph. --Gower 11:26, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Brachystola mexicana, Sierra de Guadalupe, Mexico --Cvmontuy 08:41, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 11:38, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Delta Air Line's new Airbus A321-271NX at Hamburg-Finkenwerder after test flight. By User:MarcelX42 --Augustgeyler 08:29, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
    Missing category added to this image. Go ahead and create it and attach to proper parent category or delete it? --E bailey 16:03, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
     I withdraw my nomination Thank you for reviewing. I am unable to find all the necessary details to create that category. --Augustgeyler 17:21, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kuhn Merge Maxx 1090 at Öko-Feldtagen 2025. By User:MarcelX42 --Augustgeyler 08:29, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 11:26, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Place des Acacias, in Haubourdin, France --Velvet 08:18, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 11:32, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Avenue de l'Amitié, in Santes, France --Velvet 08:09, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:34, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Autun (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Saint Andrew's ancient Roman gate and the protestant church --Benjism89 07:28, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 17:25, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Autun (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Saint Andrew's ancient Roman gate --Benjism89 07:28, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:34, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Autun (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Arroux ancient Roman gate --Benjism89 07:28, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 17:25, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Autun (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Ruins from the ancient Roman temple of Janus --Benjism89 07:28, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 17:25, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Autun (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Ruins from the ancient Roman temple of Janus --Benjism89 07:28, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:34, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Asar Mahal --Rangan Datta Wiki 07:15, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Strong chromatic aberration, blacks clipped, sky clipped. Not very sharp partially --Gower 11:26, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial view of the Grand Canyon north of Grand Canyon Village, Arizona, USA --XRay 07:07, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Lacks sharpness, sorry --Poco a poco 21:32, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from the South Rim of the Grand Canyon, Arizona, USA --XRay 07:07, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
    May be a bit soft, like the other one. --Sebring12Hrs 21:44, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
     I withdraw my nomination Thank you. The reason may be the glass of the aircraft. --XRay 07:27, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Hoover Dam, Nevada, USA --XRay 07:07, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 07:26, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Manhattan skyline, New York City, New York, USA --XRay 07:07, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:49, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Newspaper vending machines on San Diego Avenue, San Diego, California, USA --XRay 07:07, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Very detailed description! --Augustgeyler 10:49, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination White-headed buffalo weaver (Dinemellia dinemelli), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:01, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 07:08, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination White-headed buffalo weaver (Dinemellia dinemelli), Serengeti National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:01, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 07:08, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination White-headed buffalo weaver (Dinemellia dinemelli), Serengeti National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:01, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Benjism89 07:34, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: A domestic greylag goose (Anser anser) swimming on a foggy day. --Alexis Lours 06:58, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    CAs on the tail, otherwise good --Benjism89 07:36, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A male common pochard (Aythya ferina) on a foggy day. --Alexis Lours 06:58, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Really like the blurred bird of the back --Earth605 06:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A female common pochard (Aythya ferina) flapping its wings on a foggy day. --Alexis Lours 06:58, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Eyes are not sharp. Sorry. --Ermell 09:48, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A male common pochard (Aythya ferina) swimming. --Alexis Lours 06:58, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:48, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A female common pochard (Aythya ferina) swimming. --Alexis Lours 06:58, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Rangan Datta Wiki 07:16, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Strix ocellata (Mottled Wood-Owl) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:45, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:48, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Strix ocellata (Mottled Wood-Owl) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:45, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 11:35, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Zapornia akool (Brown Crake) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:45, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 07:05, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Calidris temminckii (Temminck's Stint) in Bakkhali, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:45, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 19:26, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Calidris temminckii (Temminck's Stint) in Bakkhali, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:45, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 19:26, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Right valve of a Japan Venus, Marcia japonica --Llez 06:25, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 06:31, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from the Rathausbrücke (Town Hall Bridge) towards the houses 19 -23 Krämerbrücke, Erfurt --Llez 06:25, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:09, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from the Rathausbrücke (Town Hall Bridge) towards the houses 24 - 32 Krämerbrücke, Erfurt --Llez 06:25, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:09, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from the Rathausbrücke (Town Hall Bridge) towards the houses 20 - 26 Krämerbrücke, Erfurt --Llez 06:25, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:09, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A small cluster of Jersey cow mushrooms (Suillus bovinus) --Syntaxys 06:10, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 06:27, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A cluster of young common puffballs (Lycoperdon perlatum) --Syntaxys 06:10, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 06:27, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rosy bonnet (Mycena rosea) in mixed forest near Rheinzabern --Syntaxys 06:10, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 06:27, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vestiges du théâtre et de ses portiques réparés sous Dioclétien et MaximienCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 42-26.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Skander zarrad 06:06, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 06:13, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 42-16.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Skander zarrad 06:06, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 19:04, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mausolée en forme de temple, à quatre colonnes corinthiennes sur un soubassement portant une inscription latineCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 42-18.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Skander zarrad 06:06, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 06:13, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Temple aux six colonnesCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 31-21.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Skander zarrad 06:06, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Blurred. --Sebring12Hrs 17:56, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Arc de triompheCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 31-50.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Skander zarrad 06:06, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:35, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Maastricht-NL, sculpture the Engel van Maastricht designed by Wil van der Laan --Michielverbeek 06:05, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:34, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Maastricht-NL, church: the Antonius van Paduakerk --Michielverbeek 06:05, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:29, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bemelen-NL, church: the Sint-Laurentiuskerk --Michielverbeek 06:05, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality, but quite tight framing. --Gower 19:26, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gasthuis-NL, windmill: the Van Tienhovenmolen --Michielverbeek 06:05, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 06:13, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Waltensburg/Vuorz Natural phenomenon? These clouds above the panoramic road Waltensburg/Vuorz to Breil/Brigels kept coming together to form a whole, only to fall apart again.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:06, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Too strong contrast visible on the tree, blacks clipped --Gower 08:30, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
    * Done, Contrast in the top of the tree reduced. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:04, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support Issues fixed --Earth605 06:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
    @Earth605: Thank you for stepping on others. --Lmbuga 20:05, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Waltensburg/Vuorz View of the mountain flanks above Waltensburg/Vuorz.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:06, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    That's a very nice picture, but the haze bothers me a little. I think you could remove it a bit more by masking out the foreground. Don't you agree? --Syntaxys 06:17, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
    * Done, Tried to reduce haze and adjusted WB. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:00, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support Issues fixed --Earth605 06:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
    @Earth605: Thank you for stepping on others. --Lmbuga 20:05, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination South Tower Gate of Yasaka Shrine in Kyoto --Jakubhal 04:47, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:08, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dragon-shaped hot air baloon over Kraków --Jakubhal 04:47, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 06:20, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dragon-shaped hot air baloon over Kraków --Jakubhal 04:47, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:09, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grave monument of the Ankenbrand family at the Eltmann cemetery --Plozessor 04:21, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 06:20, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Frances Adamson at the 2025 Remembrance Day at the National War Memorial, South Australia. --Pangalau 04:01, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 07:29, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Frances Adamson at the 2025 Remembrance Day at the National War Memorial, South Australia. --Pangalau 04:01, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 07:30, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Female house sparrow (Passer domesticus), Souss Massa National Park, Morocco --Tagooty 03:55, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry, but the head is not sharp enough. --LexKurochkin 07:35, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sign on compound wall, Avenue Robinia, Agdal-Ryad, Rabat, Morocco --Tagooty 03:55, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Building at Kornmarkt 5 in Quedlinburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany. --Tournasol7 03:30, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Building at Kornmarkt 6 in Quedlinburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany. --Tournasol7 03:30, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Heating stoves in Sitorai Mokhi Khosa palace, Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 00:06, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 11:38, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Heating stoves in Sitorai Mokhi Khosa palace, Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 00:06, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 11:38, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

November 11, 2025

• 
  • Nomination Khudayar Khan Palace (interior details), Kokand, Uzbekistan. By User:ElenaLitera --Екатерина Борисова 23:50, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 11:38, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Roses in Uspensky Garden, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:50, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Good composition, but the biggest flower is not very sharp, especially pistil and petals --Gower 08:30, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Centaur, outdoor sculpture in Chorzów --Gower 20:46, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:00, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Serval (Leptailurus serval), Serengeti National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 20:19, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Earth605 06:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Serval (Leptailurus serval), Serengeti National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 20:19, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Motion blurred leg. Can you fix it? --Earth605 06:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
    No, sorry, I cannot make those leg look sharp, is that a must for QI? --Poco a poco 19:29, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Blurred head IMO --Lmbuga 20:11, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination White-headed buffalo weaver (Dinemellia dinemelli), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 20:19, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Earth605 06:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Parquet flooring, Rumyantsev mansion --Lvova 20:15, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:34, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Parquet flooring in Rumyantsev mansion --Lvova 20:15, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:34, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A starcase in Rumyantsev mansion --Lvova 20:15, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Very interesting image, eye-catching one! --Gower 19:26, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rumyantsev mansion interiors --Lvova 20:15, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:34, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Upper branches of a pine tree with a mountain range in the background --Serebit 18:09, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. If possible, add the species of pine. --Tagooty 04:00, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
    I believe it's Pinus strobus—added the species to the categories. --Serebit 21:15, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A Rocky Mountain elk guarding its herd as they cross a street --Serebit 18:09, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry, but it's all cut. This is not QI. --Syntaxys 06:28, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
    Cut? --Serebit 12:03, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
    Changing to discussion as I'm not sure what you meant by "cut" here and haven't received a reply. Others, feel free to decline if you don't see it as QI. --Serebit 14:49, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Per Syntaxys, the legs should be whole. I don't think the composition is appropriate for a QI picture. --Lmbuga 15:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
    Understood, moving back to Decline. --Serebit 15:53, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A female mallard duck overlooking her ducklings as they take a well-deserved nap --Serebit 18:09, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Beautiful! --PeterCooperJr 01:42, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Upper branches of a pine tree with a mountain range in the background --Serebit 18:09, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Lacks detail, average optical resolution (it's Pseudostuga sp. btw) --Gower 19:26, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
    Pseudostuga sp. doesn't refer to any species that I can find. I think it's more likely Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca. --Serebit 21:30, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Porsche 992 Turbo S coupe at IAA 2025 --Alexander-93 17:44, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:38, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Denza D9 DM-i at IAA 2025 --Alexander-93 17:44, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:38, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tenerife Daisy growing near the Ruta Mirador de Pico Viejo on the Teide in La Orotava, Tenerife, Spain --FlocciNivis 17:23, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:31, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Mezereon in the forest, South of the nature reserve Freisinger Buckl, in Eitting --FlocciNivis 17:23, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Can we get a crop? The tree is so distracting --Earth605 06:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)}
     Done I did a different crop --FlocciNivis 20:00, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jaguar F-Type Convertible R at MYLE Festival 2025 --Alexander-93 16:46, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:02, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lamborghini Revuelto at MYLE Festival 2025 --Alexander-93 16:46, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:38, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mercedes-Benz W463 G 63 AMG 6×6 at MYLE Festival 2025 --Alexander-93 16:46, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:38, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Antoni Strenk tenement house, 1907 design. Kazimierz Wyczyński, 1 Dunajewskiego street, Piasek, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 15:09, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    I keep wondering why you can't take or at least crop your photos to emphasize symmetry or interesting decorative elements, but just show random pieces of facades with pieces of different elements here and there. --Екатерина Борисова 01:22, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Antoni Strenk tenement house, 1907 design. Kazimierz Wyczyński, 1 Dunajewskiego street, Piasek, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 15:09, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Earth605 06:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Antoni Strenk tenement house, 1907 design. Kazimierz Wyczyński, 1 Dunajewskiego street, Piasek, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 15:09, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Unfavorable cropping. Upper row of windows is cut and the lowest is redundant --Gower 10:38, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Toyota Alphard in Johor Bahru --MB-one 13:57, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Tilted ccw? Otherwise good. --Tagooty 04:01, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
     Done rotation applied --MB-one 22:49, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support Issues fixed --Earth605 06:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Participants during Wikimania 2013 --MB-one 13:57, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Low optical resolution, lacks detail, sorry. I know that's 2013 but... --Gower 19:26, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Northern rough-winged swallow, Bolton Notch State Park, Bolton, CT USA --Pdanese 13:35, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    @Pdanese: very good. I suggest retouching of four spots (probably flying insects), I added imagenotes. --Gower 08:25, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
    Done. --Pdanese 13:02, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
    @Pdanese: , last one to retouch in right lower corner ;) --Gower 19:28, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Avenue Al Eucalypthus, eucalyptus trees on right, Rabat, Morocco --Tagooty 09:10, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    As far as I know, washed out license plates are not welcome here. --Екатерина Борисова 01:32, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
    Blanking the license plate is frequently done in Commons --Tagooty 08:34, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
    I know and I often do this myself. But they always find fault with it here. --Екатерина Борисова 03:53, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
    If you agree with "them", please decline the image so I can send it to CR. Otherwise, please review the quality. --Tagooty 04:02, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Avenue Al Eucalypthus, eucalyptus trees on right, Rabat, Morocco --Tagooty 09:10, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    As far as I know, washed out license plates are not welcome here. --Екатерина Борисова 01:32, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
    Blanking the license plate is frequently done in Commons --Tagooty 08:34, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
    I know and I often do this myself. But they always find fault with it here. --Екатерина Борисова 03:53, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
    If you agree with "them", please decline the image so I can send it to CR. Otherwise, please review the quality. --Tagooty 04:02, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Embraer ERJ-190AR from German Airways taking of at Hannover-Langenhagen Airport. By User:MarcelX42 --Augustgeyler 08:35, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Very nice. --Gower 08:25, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Airbus A319-111 from easyJet on approach to Hamburg. By User:MarcelX42 --Augustgeyler 08:35, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Very nice. --Gower 08:25, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: The Royal court of Cooch Behar at Cooch Behar Palace --Herpking 08:32, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Why not a PC ? --Sebring12Hrs 14:46, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Temple aux six colonnesCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 31-21.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Skander zarrad 08:21, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Very nice image. But there is colour banding in the sky. Can you improve this? --Augustgeyler 08:39, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
    I've corrected that, thank you for the feedback. --Skander zarrad 10:30, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
     Comment Sorry but the colourbanding at the sky is still there. --Augustgeyler 10:36, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support I can't see any issue with the sky (zero noise), the picture is sharp, the perspective ok, a bit overexposed, but it's QI to me. --Sebring12Hrs 19:12, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
    I yessss, I can see a posterization, but this is very minimal. --Sebring12Hrs 19:13, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support QI to me. --Sebring12Hrs 19:14, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Interior of White Mosque in Bolgar. --Mike1979 Russia 07:12, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 11:22, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Attic of the main gates of Sitorai Mokhi Khosa complex. Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 06:00, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Two dust spots (left and right upper corners), otherwise good. --Екатерина Борисова 01:41, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
     Done --Красный 23:23, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support OK now, thanks. --Екатерина Борисова 04:23, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Main gates of Sitorai Mokhi Khosa complex. Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 06:00, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Good, but slight PC needed. --Gower 20:58, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
     Done. --Красный 22:16, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Porch of the two-story dormitory, Sitorai Mokhi Khosa complex. Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 06:00, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Earth605 06:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gazebo (summer mosque) of Sitorai Mokhi Khosa complex. Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 06:00, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Earth605 06:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Rotterdam-NL, cables of the bridge (the Erasmusbrug) --Michielverbeek 05:52, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Very nice, but posterization goes from the bottom left corner and traces of retouching or erasing (?) in that corner too. --Gower 08:25, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Breil-Brigels View of the flanks of the Anterior Rhine.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:11, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Unnatural desaturation (?) and I suggest different cropping without branches on the left, what do you think? --Gower 20:58, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
    *:@Gower Done. Correction. Thanks for your reviews.
     Support Good quality. --Gower 08:18, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

November 10, 2025

• 
  • Nomination Exterior details of Lidval house (angle view), Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:52, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
    PC needed, purple fringing can be reduced too --Gower 08:25, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
    There's no any purple fringing, but I can't improve PC without making the image unnaturally distorted, so  I withdraw my nomination. -- Екатерина Борисова 04:29, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Exterior details of Lidval house (angle view), Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:52, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Average optical resolution, too small aperture number --Gower 08:25, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 82-71 in Tunisia.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Majbri wael 22:51, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose nice, but too soft, sorry --Gower 08:25, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Samarkand pilaf in Tashkent, 2024 --Umarxon III 22:28, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Looks overprocessed. Did you take the image in RAW? Then it should probably be fixable. --MB-one 14:19, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
    Thats not overprocess and not RAW, but standart camera regime in the phone. The picture was clearer due to the ambient light and my hand not shaking while taking the picture. Umarxon III 15:41, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose In that case, I sadly have to decline. --MB-one 17:04, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: A row of yellow painted houses and a vintage street light in an alley in Gamla Stan, the old town of Stockholm, Sweden. --OleNeitzel 16:49, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 18:19, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: A row of brightly painted houses behind a dark tunnel in an alley in Gamla Stan, the old town of Stockholm, Sweden. --OleNeitzel 16:49, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    The light is harsh in the background (but I know it is very hard from this dark vault). Let's see what others think. --Sebring12Hrs 18:24, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Prototype 90 80 0550 000 by Stadler Rail Pankow at Innotrans 2024. By User:Falk2 --Augustgeyler 15:49, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Good image, except for the object on the bottom left --MB-one 16:06, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
     Comment I'm Sorry. As I'm not the author I can't do anything about it. Please decide on what the image is right now. --Augustgeyler 08:40, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Spherical panoramic at New Golden Beach in Paros, Greece --Domob 14:01, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Not bad, but I can see a minor stiching error, the horizon is tilted, and I ould crop the foreground, wich is very distorted due to the panoramic view. --Sebring12Hrs 14:53, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
     Comment Thanks for the review. I have improved the stitching error in the ocean as much as I could, and levelled the horizon. I want the picture to be a full sphere, so it is expected that the foreground (nadir) is very distorted. --Domob 18:29, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Abarth 600e Scorpionissima at Autofrühling Ulm 2025 --Alexander-93 13:42, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Earth605 06:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Isuzu D-Max (third generation) at autoMOBIL Tübingen 2025 --Alexander-93 13:42, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Good, but messy surroundings and as usual clipped blacks. --Gower 10:38, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kia EV4 GT-Line at Auto Zuerich 2025 --Alexander-93 13:21, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:12, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Serval (Leptailurus serval), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 13:15, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    I think it needs sharpening. --Sebring12Hrs 15:43, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
     Sharpened --Poco a poco 20:23, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025 Porsche 718 Spyder RS --TTTNIS 10:40, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Earth605 06:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination AmphithéâtreCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 53-3.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Skander zarrad 09:52, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Too much vignetting. --Sebring12Hrs 15:21, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
    And PC is needed. All the buildings are leaning. --Sebring12Hrs 15:22, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
    I've just made the corrections, thank you. --Skander zarrad 15:30, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:03, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: AmphithéâtreCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 13-14.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Skander zarrad 09:52, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 10:05, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
    what is PC, please? --Skander zarrad 12:23, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
    Pc means perspective correction. --Sebring12Hrs 13:41, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
    No need to go to CR. --Sebring12Hrs 13:55, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
     Comment Exactly! Sending an image to CR without a vote is against the rules. Please discuss here (or rather do the PC!) Reverted to "/Nomination". --Robert Flogaus-Faust 14:33, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
    I've just made the corrections, thank you. Sorry, I placed the wrong order earlier. --Skander zarrad 15:30, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
    Sorry, but I see a crop, not a perspective correction. Tha walls appear leaning like on the previous version. --Sebring12Hrs 01:14, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Ford Transit at Classic-Gala Schwetzingen 2025 --MB-one 09:47, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: View over the old canal from the Deûle to Haubourdin, France --Velvet 09:09, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Purple CAs at the upper right edge, in the leaves. --Sebring12Hrs 09:30, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
     Done Thank you for your review --Velvet 12:05, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
    Aaaahh, but it's just a crop. --Sebring12Hrs 17:36, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
    Yes, for the most part. But I don't think it distorts the image.--Velvet 12:49, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Prelates House, 4 Mariacki square, facade, Old Town, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 08:00, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Tenement house, 1893, 6 Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie street, portal, Kraków, Poland.jpg --Igor123121 08:00, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Average optical resolution (partially looks like motion blur), because of such framing portal is not well exposed and door is cut. --Gower 07:02, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gate in Bolgar. --Mike1979 Russia 07:53, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Needs more categories. --Ermell 11:22, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
    Categories added. Thank you. --Mike1979 Russia 10:17, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:18, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Calidris alba (Sanderling) in Bakkhali, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 07:40, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose too soft, sorry --Gower 08:25, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Rector's Office, University of Zulia. --Rjcastillo 02:06, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    The right wall of the building is leaning. --Sebring12Hrs 09:42, 10 November 2025 (UTC) Done Thanks. --Rjcastillo 23:13, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

November 9, 2025

• 
  • Nomination Relief on listed building in Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:51, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:19, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Heylenny 04:24, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 82-68 in Tunisia.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Majbri wael 22:31, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    IMO too much distraction. Could be mitigated by cropping --MB-one 14:19, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Special stage 1 of the 18. ADAC Stormarn Classic rallye in Lütjensee, Schleswig-Holstein --MB-one 21:23, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Car is not very sharp and that road sign ruins compositon. --Gower 10:38, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Erener Revolution-T XL on Iveco Daily chassis --MB-one 21:23, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Yard of Auto-Dentz in Frankfurt-Ostend --MB-one 21:23, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: General view from the viewpoint of the Seu Vella in Lleida, Catalonia --IM027 20:42, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Slight PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 21:13, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Close-up view of the Seu Vella of Lleida, Catalonia --IM027 20:42, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 21:12, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Bell Tower of the Seu Vella of Lleida, Catalonia --IM027 20:42, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    I'm not convinced bi this point of view without any perspective correction. --Sebring12Hrs 21:15, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Street art - Ruelle des Archers à Douai --JackyM59 19:19, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Slight PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 20:34, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
    Corrections made --JackyM59 07:57, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Autre église dont il existe l'absideCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 22-49.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Skander zarrad 19:08, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Noised sky at top, otherwise good --George Chernilevsky 20:24, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
    Beautiful image, but the sky is a little bit noisy at the upper right. Other opinion ? --Sebring12Hrs 20:37, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
    I just fixed the noise in the sky --Skander zarrad 15:38, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 19:37, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Basilique au nord-est de l'arc de TrajanCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 34-43.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Skander zarrad 19:08, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Some CA on branches at top. --George Chernilevsky 20:19, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
    I just corrected the CAs --Skander zarrad 15:38, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: White Mosque in Bolgar. --Mike1979 Russia 09:20, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Weak CA at the top of the tower. --Ermell 20:43, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
    Tried to fix. Thank you. --Mike1979 Russia 17:17, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
    Stll there at the top. --Ermell 23:20, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
     I withdraw my nomination. Thnk you. I can't fix this. --Mike1979 Russia 09:53, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination One World Trade Center, New York City, New York, USA --XRay 06:28, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
    There are spots or artifacts and it is a bit blurred. --Sebring12Hrs 12:50, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
     I withdraw my nomination I'll fix it within the next days and renominate it. Thank you. --XRay 07:23, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Inside the "Former basalt quarries on Bramberg" geotope near Hohnhausen (Burgpreppach) --Plozessor 04:30, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    The top of the tree is a bit blurred. --Sebring12Hrs 14:27, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
    @Sebring12Hrs: Right, didn't consider that a big issue as the subject is the outcrop. Won't be offended if you decline it. --Plozessor 04:55, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Covered bridge in Lądek-Zdrój 2 --Jacek Halicki 00:28, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Highlights should be reduced. --Ermell 20:39, 9 November 2025 (UTC)@Ermell:  Done--Jacek Halicki 18:47, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:21, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

November 8, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: A row of old houses in an alley in Gamla Stan, the old town of Stockholm, Sweden. --OleNeitzel 22:50, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Only the left facade is in focus. --Sebring12Hrs 14:31, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A row of brightly painted houses, close together in an alley in Gamla Stan, the old town of Stockholm, Sweden. --OleNeitzel 22:50, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Oppose Background buildings are blurred. I don't know what is exactly in focus here. --Sebring12Hrs 14:31, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
     Comment After a secon d review. I decided to cancel my opposing, because the focus isn't so failed. --Sebring12Hrs 20:23, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Heylenny 04:24, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2021 Ferrari Monza SP2 --TTTNIS 14:43, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Disctracting background --Gower 07:02, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rear view of 2021 Ferrari Monza SP2 --TTTNIS 14:43, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Disctracting background --Gower 07:02, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 1992 Nissan 300ZX --TTTNIS 14:43, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
     Level of detail too low and  Underexposed. Can you improve it? --Augustgeyler 09:01, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Mairie d'Erchin --JackyM59 09:44, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Slight PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 10:21, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
    Corrections made --JackyM59 21:12, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Indian peafowl (Pavo cristatus), Changuu Island, Tanzania --Poco a poco 08:27, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Feathers on head are not sharp enough. --Brihaspati 13:55, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
    I don't see an issue there, the head is sharp. If you don't believe that this is a FP, please, decline. --Poco a poco 21:02, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
    sharpness of feathers could be better indeed. --Gower 11:37, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

November 7, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: Building of the Polish Academy of Learning, 1857 design. Filip Pokutyński, 17 Sławkowska Street, Old Town, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 20:18, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Tenement house, 4 Węgłowa street, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 20:18, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:09, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 82-7 in Tunisia.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Majbri wael 18:40, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Object not sharp enough --Brihaspati 19:30, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: A view of Shibuya's famous crossing --Davekern 16:25, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    PC needed, too high contrast. --Gower 17:19, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Scania timber truck at Nufam 2025 in Rheinstetten --MB-one 11:17, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Good, could be improved by tightening the crop to cut out the half person on the left. --Fdy3k 21:44, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
     Done Thanks for the review --MB-one 17:04, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Olive baboons (Papio anubis), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 06:35, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:19, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Heylenny 04:24, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Belair National Park, South Australia in 2025. --Pangalau 05:42, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Purple cast in the clouds; purple CA in the upper part. --Tagooty 05:55, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Waltensburg/Vuorz From the panoramic road we look east into the Anterior Rhine Valley, where wisps of cloud obscure the view.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:11, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    A bit noisy IMO. Otherwise very good --MB-one 10:02, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
    *:@MB-one Done. Noise Reduction. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:39, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support Very good quality. Potential FPC IMO --MB-one 16:54, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

November 6, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: Plaque du Musée des promesses au Jardin d'Essai de la Fondation Zinsou à Ouidah --Fawaz.tairou 22:44, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    There is a bit of a tilt. Can you fix it? --Earth605 05:55, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 82-39 in Tunisia.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Majbri wael 21:26, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Left side is leaning out --Poco a poco 22:28, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Forest trail in Nackareservatet --ArildV 21:10, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Can you reduce blue fringing around branches? --Gower 17:19, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
    I think it's minor here. --Sebring12Hrs 15:04, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
    I wasn’t able to completely fix that issue, but it’s a very minor technical flaw, visible only when the image is examined at 100% on a screen. In all other respects, the image exceeds the expected quality level here imo. --ArildV 16:25, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Memorial stone of the first May Day rally in 1890 on the Bischofswiese in the Dölauer Heide near Halle (Saale) --Romzig 20:36, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    That huge spot of light doesn't help --Gower 21:00, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Wörlitz Castle --Romzig 20:36, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    The right wall of the castle is leaning to the left. PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 15:00, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Hiking trail to Ebersberg near Hohegeiß in the Harz Mountains --Romzig 20:36, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Some dust spots on the sky to erase --Gower 17:19, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: A serene view of the high-altitude pastures near Chota Baldar, close to Mudh Village in the Pin Valley National Park, Spiti region, Himachal Pradesh, India. The photograph captures the contrast between the lush green alpine meadows and the arid slopes of the trans-Himalayan terrain, with local herders and their yaks grazing under a clear blue sky.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Schwiki 20:08, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review Fine motif, but especially the sky is to noisy. --Milseburg 20:25, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
    Updated modified version, thank you ! --Schwiki 18:31, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Exit from Bayterek tower in Astana --MB-one 14:01, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Red light of the AF is mirroring at the stairs. Should be removed IMO. --Ermell 20:16, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
     Done cloned out the reflection --MB-one 22:40, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:22, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Entrance of hotel "Continental du Sud" in Hamngatan 13, Ystad, Sweden. --OleNeitzel 12:14, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Some barrel distortion (visible in the outer flag poles) --MB-one 14:07, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Gravestone of German writer Kurt Tucholsky in the cemetery of Mariefred, Sweden. Inscription: "Alles Vergängliche Ist Nur Ein Gleichnis" ("All that is transitory is but a metaphor" from Goethe's Faust, Part II). --OleNeitzel 12:14, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Tilted to the left --Earth605 14:14, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

November 5, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: Tenement house, 14 Mikołajska Street, Old Town, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 20:22, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Quality is good, but could you please crop a bit the bottom part and the right side to make the whole composition more balanced? --Екатерина Борисова 01:47, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
    I suggest cropping, too. --Gower 17:55, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ferrari Daytona SP3 --TTTNIS 12:35, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Comment The image is down-sampled which is not matching the QIC standards. Please give a 1:1 file. --Augustgeyler 09:01, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose  Not done in a week --Екатерина Борисова 03:59, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

November 4, 2025

• 
  • Nomination Crêperie & Logi, Visby. --ArildV 16:14, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Purple fringing near gutters to fix --Gower 16:32, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
    Done. Thanks for reviews. --ArildV 16:48, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
    And green fringe on the roof. --Sebring12Hrs 17:59, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
    Done --ArildV 16:28, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
    There is still a bit green fringe on the roof --Sebring12Hrs 10:42, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
    Done --ArildV 16:21, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Gower 11:37, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Juliusza Slowackiego street in Swinoujscie --MB-one 15:43, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Slight PC needed. --Gower 14:15, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
     Done PC applied --MB-one 22:36, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Gower 11:37, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

November 2, 2025

• 
  • Nomination Convent of the Jesuits, 8a Sienna street, Old Town, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 09:20, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Very, nice, but could you crop until the pipe? The door and the semi cropped windows on the right side is budging --Earth605 06:17, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
    @Earth605:  Done --Igor123121 11:16, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Gower 11:37, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

October 29, 2025

• 
  • Nomination Teatralny fountain - Moscow --Юрий Д.К. 20:16, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Looks like tilted to the right, otherwise good. --Екатерина Борисова 22:58, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
    Hi, @Екатерина Борисова: . Are you sure that the photo is tilted? I've checked the verticals on the buildings and couldn't find any tilt. --Юрий Д.К. 19:30, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
    No, I'm not sure, so I didn't say "tilted", but "looks like tilted" :) Buildings are vertical, but the fountain vase looks like leaning to the right. But maybe it's just an illusion. --Екатерина Борисова 01:43, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
    Could someone check this image? I can't find that it is tilted --Юрий Д.К. 09:09, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality, walls in the background are straight --Gower 11:37, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

October 26, 2025

• 
  • Nomination Hardware Tools Supporting Wikimedia Projects logo --Suyash.dwivedi 22:00, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
    The HT letters look a little bit messy on close inspection. This is likely increasing the file size. Could it be cleaned up to use fewer nodes simpler geometric shapes? --MB-one 09:25, 31 October 2025 (UTC):@MB-one: Actually, HT is inspired by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printed_circuit_board the Electronic circuit board to reflect this project also welcomes electronics-related projects.Suyash.dwivedi 22:40, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
    I understand, that it's supposed to resemble the surface of a PCB. However, I believe, that the desired effect could be reached with fewer nodes and less complicated splines. Especially the many circular-ish shapes could be simple circles, almost straight curves could be straight lines, etc. The text on the bottom is a good example. --MB-one 16:01, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Rejecting for now. Will support a renomination, once the issues have been adressed. --MB-one 16:51, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

Consensual review

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

• To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
• You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
• The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.

Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.

Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted

• In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
• Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add  Oppose and  Support if necessary.
• Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
• Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".

File:Breeding_Double-Crested_Cormorant_Close-Up_Profile.jpg

• Nomination A double-crested cormorant in breeding plumage in Davis, California --Polinova 18:04, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Gower 18:20, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Very nice eyes, but a very bad beak. --Lmbuga 18:49, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Augustgeyler 08:17, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Green_Lynx_spider_protecting_her_eggsac_(50170644583).jpg

• Nomination . By User:Dhx1 --Cvmontuy 09:55, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. Good compotistion too. --Gower 10:38, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Info Sorry, I am the nominator, but I just realized this image comes from Flickr and the author is probably not a Wikimedian. --Cvmontuy 13:19, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment It's a shame. It's as beautiful as it is terrifying. --Lmbuga 14:51, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not taken by a Commons user. --Plozessor 05:50, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Plozessor -- George Chernilevsky 07:07, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Augustgeyler 08:16, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

File:J35_530_ČSSR-Grenzsäule.jpg

• Nomination Czechoslovak border post. By User:Falk2 --Augustgeyler 08:27, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Average texture as for Canon EOS 5D Mark III --Gower 10:45, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment I disagree. There is plenty of texture at the object. --Augustgeyler 15:06, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:00, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Sebring12Hrs 09:00, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Mausolée_de_Sidi_G'naou_vue_intérieur.jpg

• Nomination Mausolée de Sidi G'naouCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 81-21.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Skander zarrad 04:55, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Pillars are not sharp enough. --Brihaspati 05:45, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Ok to me due to the resolution. --Ermell 06:05, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Pillars are sharp. --Earth605 06:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose CAs, strong CAs IMO. Lack of clarity.--Lmbuga 19:55, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Noise, blurred, CAs... --Sebring12Hrs 21:12, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Brihaspati & Sebring12Hrs --Gower 11:32, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --Gower 11:32, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Panasonic_GXM,_Ottobrunn_(P1046195).jpg

• Nomination Prototype of a Panasonic GXM mid-mounted pedelec motor on a work bench --MB-one 16:40, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 05:30, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but the right side is out of focus. Let's discuss. --LexKurochkin 05:33, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Support I don't see it that out of focus --Earth605 06:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose per LexKurochkin --Gower 11:31, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Gower 11:31, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Tejedor_intermedio_(Ploceus_intermedius),_parque_nacional_Serengueti,_Tanzania,_2024-05-26,_DD_74.jpg

• Nomination Lesser masked weaver (Ploceus intermedius), Serengeti National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:01, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose weaver is totally out of focus. If the nest was the main topic, there is a greater chance of promotion here. --Gower 07:02, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

•  Done I changed the subject, why do you make that suggestion and still go for a straight decline? --Poco a poco 19:29, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

 Support changed my mind --Gower (talk) 11:30, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Gower (talk) 11:30, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Hoverfly_(Eristalinus)_on_sulfur_cosmos_(Cosmos_sulphureus)_flower,_Parque_do_Monteiro-Mor,_Lisboa,_Portugal_julesvernex2.jpg

• Nomination Hoverfly (Eristalinus) on sulfur cosmos (Cosmos sulphureus) flower, Parque do Monteiro-Mor, Lisboa, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 01:08, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:29, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Flower is blury. --Heylenny 04:24, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

• The hoverfly is the subject, why should the flower need to be fully in focus? I chose an aperture that combines a fully focused subject with a smooth in-focus to out-of-focus transition, and a nice bokeh --Julesvernex2 08:50, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

•  Support I would have cropped in a little further. But that's a matter of taste. I think the main object (the hoverfly) is very well captured and in focus. Additionally the image tones are very nicely balanced. --

Augustgeyler 08:57, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

•  Support fly is very sharp, flower is not, but OK anyway --Gower 11:28, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Gower 11:28, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Узбекистан,_Коканд,_дворец_Худояр-хана_(7).jpg

• Nomination Khudayar Khan Palace (main entrance), Kokand, Uzbekistan. By User:ElenaLitera --Екатерина Борисова 23:50, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Comment Dust spots, moiré?, --Lmbuga 23:59, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

• I don't see any dust spots here. Please make a note. --Екатерина Борисова 01:06, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• Found one dust spot and there's a horizontal structure in the sky. It's not moiré IMO, but it looks like a canvas --Syntaxys 06:24, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

• The stain is visible without zooming in on the image. It is almost on top of the tower on the right, slightly to the left of it. Even if you fix the stain, the horizontal structure visible in the sky prevents me from promoting it. Is it a photo of a poster or another photo? I won't oppose it because I don't understand what's going on.--Lmbuga 15:08, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

• Yes, I see now these issues, thank you. I can remove dust spots (hope the author won't mind), but I can do nothing with these textures. So i will withdraw this nomination soon after our conversation is finished. But I assure you that this is a real photo taken IRL, I know it for sure. --Екатерина Борисова 04:16, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose I'm going to bend the rules. I don't think I should give my opinion because I don't have enough knowledge, but I believe that others with more knowledge could help. I am against sending the photo to CR. --Lmbuga 15:11, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment My vote may change if what other users say convinces me. I can remove the spot myself. Such a small change does not scare me.--Lmbuga 15:21, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

• OK, I was going to withdraw this nomination, but if you're interested in hearing other opinions, let it be. -- Екатерина Борисова 03:44, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Augustgeyler 08:04, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Atlas_Cedar_SW_Tazekka_Peak_Nov25_A7CR_09395.jpg

• Nomination SW face, Jbel Tazekka peak, cloaked with Atlas cedar (Cedrus atlantica). Tazekka National Park, Morocco --Tagooty 09:10, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Comment Only the piece of foreground is in focus. --Екатерина Борисова 01:34, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

• The mobile towers in the distance are quite sharp. --Tagooty 08:37, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

• They are not very sharp. And the fir trees are not sharp at all. --Екатерина Борисова 03:49, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
  

•  Info This is the natural look of a large area of cedar trees. Let's hear other opinions. Sending to CR in view of the implicit oppose. --Tagooty 04:02, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Sharpness is good enough overall IMO. --Augustgeyler 10:40, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Augustgeyler 07:59, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Berlin_Brandenburg_Airport_easyJet_Europe_Airbus_A320-214(WL)_OE-IVL_(DSC07765).jpg

• Nomination Airbus A320-214(WL) from easyJet Europe on approach to BER. By User:MarcelX42 --Augustgeyler 08:29, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Gower 11:26, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment Too tight crop--Lmbuga 19:42, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose For the reasons stated above --Lmbuga 19:46, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

• Well, yes it's tight. But I also know that this is somehow kind of a convention within planespotting filling the frame a bit tighter. I think the overall quality here speaks for QI even with the tighter framing. So am very interested in more opinions. --Augustgeyler 15:56, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

• @Augustgeyler: I am also very interested because what is said may be decisive in my future opinions. Do not think that I am sure I am right. If these photos are promoted, I will never oppose others for this reason, although I will not promote them either because I do not like them. As I don't like most photos of cars, but there is more space. --Lmbuga 21:32, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

• I need to learn. Like everyone else.--Lmbuga 21:46, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

• Sorry--Lmbuga 21:53, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

• OK, but we need you to make decisions based on experience or confidence. If I am unsure about my vote I would not vote (or if that happens in CR – vote with {{n}} ). But I would especially suggest not challenging someone else's vote like you did here. --Augustgeyler 21:57, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

You ignore me. I'm not a child, treat me as an equal. Any other questions will be answered on my discussion page; this is not the place for them. I don't think you'll be welcome there.--Lmbuga 22:08, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

• @Augustgeyler : You know very well that if he did not vote "decline", the photo would be promoted too quickly and the nomination would not have had more opinions... But in my opinion, I don't know ! I am  Neutral. --Sebring12Hrs 23:40, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

• I am sorry. I did not want to upset you. Of course you have to be equally treated like everybody else here. I told you how I would vote in unsure cases. What I just wanted to point out is my suggestion not to vote against nominations, promoted by other reviewers while being unsure. --Augustgeyler 22:16, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

• The criteria at QIC have changed. They are not the same as they were fifteen years ago. Fifteen years ago, those photos of aeroplanes would have been rejected. I just need to know what the criteria are now. I have my own criteria: they are not QI.--Lmbuga 22:54, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

But I am able to adapt to the collective criteria.--Lmbuga 23:12, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment I did a search for QI images of Boeing 737 and pretty quickly found many QI images with tight cropping. Here's 4 of them: here, here, here, and here. All of these within last 15 months. So what's the standard we should be using to judge 'too tight crop'? --E bailey 01:55, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --LexKurochkin 06:16, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Hannover_Airport_ASL_Airlines_Ireland_Amazon_Air_Boeing_737-8AS(BCF)(WL)_EI-DAC_(DSC07403).jpg

• Nomination Amazon Air's Boeing 737-8AS(BCF)(WL) from ASL Airlines Ireland at Hanover-Langenhagen. By User:MarcelX42 --Augustgeyler 08:29, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
  
•  Support Good quality. --Gower 19:26, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  
•  Comment Too tight crop --Lmbuga 19:40, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  

•  Oppose For the reasons stated above --Lmbuga 19:46, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. --E bailey 01:05, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --LexKurochkin 06:15, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Hannover_Airport_Royal_Canadian_Air_Force_Government_of_Canada_Airbus_CC-330_330002_(DSC03094).jpg

• Nomination Airbus CC-330 (A330-243) by Royal Canadian Air Force at Hanover. By User:MarcelX42 --Augustgeyler 08:29, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
  
•  Support Good quality. --E bailey 19:26, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  
•  Comment Too tight crop --Lmbuga 19:40, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  

•  Oppose For the reasons stated above --Lmbuga 19:46, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --LexKurochkin 06:14, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Tejedor_búfalo_de_cabeza_blanca_(Dinemellia_dinemelli),_parque_nacional_Serengueti,_Tanzania,_2024-05-26,_DD_63.jpg

• Nomination White-headed buffalo weaver (Dinemellia dinemelli), Serengeti National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:01, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
  
•  Oppose Wonderful bird, but most of it is unsharp. --Gower 08:31, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  

• Have you read this: COM:QICGVP (especially #4), please, think about it. Why the rush? --Poco a poco 21:00, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

• @Poco a poco: yes, I have. I don't believe that significant unsharpness can be solved in any way except making a new photo of something, sorry. --Gower 11:26, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

•  Weak oppose I agree with Gower in this case. The head is in focus and very good, but the body is completely blurry, which means that the center of the image and the conspicuous red feathers are also blurred. I also cannot understand what could be changed about this. Sorry --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:13, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Question I couldn't follow, sorry. Do you believe that it isn't a QI because the head is behind the body? Not sure whether I would consider such an argument valid Poco a poco 19:31, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Eyes are in focus. un-sharp body is adding to the depth of scene. --Augustgeyler 09:48, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:13, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Informationstafel_Extratour_Michelsberg_am_Rastplatz_bei_der_Haltestelle_Klinik_Michelsberg_(Münnerstadt).jpg_(1).jpg

• Nomination "Extratour Michelsberg" information board at the "Michelsberg hospital" bus stop near Münnerstadt --Plozessor 04:21, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:10, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose This image shows a modern information board containing maps, text, and photos. Such boards usually constitute copyrighted graphic works (layout, cartography, and photographs) and therefore are not freely licensable under Commons rules. In Germany, the freedom of panorama does not apply to such informational panels, as they are not considered artistic works permanently located in public space. While the technical quality is fine, the subject itself is not eligible for free publication on Wikimedia Commons and therefore can not be QI.. --Augustgeyler 18:07, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

   Comment This is interesting. I can find hardly anything about freedom of panorama (or lack thereof) for information boards in Germany on the web, except for a vivid discussion on https://www.outdoorseiten.net/vb5/forum/outdooraktivit%C3%A4ten/outdoor-basiswissen/orientierung-navigation-geocaching/88704-wiedergabe-von-infotafeln, which shows IMO that at least the admins of that site share your concerns and that they deleted this kind of photos. If your opinion is correct, then a huge number of the files in subcategories of Category:Information boards in Germany by state (including the candidate image) should be deleted from Commons. Is there any court decision, legal guideline or even something on Commons that supports your opinion? --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:45, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

• Thank you for the comment. I agree with you, this might be a bigger issue. My point is based mainly on Commons’ own copyright policy rather than on national case law. According to Commons:Licensing and Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter, information panels that combine maps, text, photographs and designed layout are usually considered copyrighted works and therefore not acceptable on Commons unless clearly in the public domain or under a free licence. The German Version about signs (Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter/de#Anzeigetafeln_und_Schilder) is not that clear, but I read that freedom of panorama does not apply to this kind of signs, only 2D-artwork would be part of FoP. – „Als Faustregel gilt, dass detaillierte Informations- und Aufklärungsschilder […] fast immer urheberrechtlich geschützt sind und Fotos davon normalerweise nicht akzeptiert werden können. Hinweistafeln können grafische Abbildungen oder erweiterte Textinhalte oder beides enthalten und das Urheberrecht besteht wahrscheinlich in beiden Fällen. Hauptausnahme: wenn ein Schild (z. B. ein Wegweiser) keine signifikanten grafischen Elemente enthält […]. 2D-Kunstwerke sind in den meisten Panoramafreieits-Ländern in der Panoramafreiheits-Ausnahme enthalten, aber nicht in: […] OK Text ist enthalten in der Panoramafreiheits-Ausnahme von […] Deutschland […].“ / translated: “As a rule of thumb, detailed information and explanatory boards […] are almost always protected by copyright, and photos of them usually cannot be accepted. Information boards may contain graphic illustrations or extended text content or both, and copyright is likely to exist in both cases. Main exception: if a sign (e.g. a wayfinding sign) contains no significant graphic elements […]. 2D artworks are included in the freedom-of-panorama exception in most freedom-of-panorama countries, but not in: […]. / OK: text is included in the freedom-of-panorama exception of […] Germany […].”– How do you read this? --Augustgeyler 12:26, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

• O.k., thanks for these rules. You are right. So this might be a rather big copyvio issue. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 14:16, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

• The rules posted by Augustgeyler link to Freedom_of_panorama#Summary_table, and that table says that Germany allows Buildings, 3D artwork, 2D artwork, and text (everything but interiors). IMO an information board is a combination of 2D artwork and text, and it is a permanent installation. The statement that 'pictures of information panels can usually not be accepted' is - even in the German translation - not specific to Germany. I'm not a legal expert, but I do not see a clear violation of either German law or Commons' policy on these pictures of information boards as long as they are located on public ground in Germany. --Plozessor 15:24, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

•  Question Is such a sign considered as 2D artwork? --Augustgeyler 15:33, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

• IMO the images and the maps are 2D artwork, the text is text, and the sign is a combination of 2D artwork and text. Of course that could again be considered a 2D artwork as a whole. In any case, the FoP definition is part of the copyright law and mentions "works". IMO - if the sign is a "work" per copyright law, it is covered by FoP. If it would not be a "work" per copyright law, copyright would not apply at all. I don't see how some works would be protected by copyright, but only "artworks" (not all "works") would be covered by FoP. It is a "work", it is permanently installed on public ground, it is visible from public ground, and the picture was taken from public ground from the perspective of a pedestrian. --Plozessor 17:11, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
• "Zulässig ist, Werke, die sich bleibend an öffentlichen Wegen, Straßen oder Plätzen befinden, mit Mitteln der Malerei oder Graphik, durch Lichtbild oder durch Film zu vervielfältigen, zu verbreiten und öffentlich wiederzugeben. Bei Bauwerken erstrecken sich diese Befugnisse nur auf die äußere Ansicht." translation “It is permissible to reproduce, distribute, and publicly display works that are permanently located on public paths, streets, or squares by means of painting or graphic art, photography, or film. In the case of buildings, these rights extend only to the exterior view.” It doesn't say anything that it would not cover all works, or that the work must not be the main subject, or that it's only allowed if the work is a minor part. On the contrary, it says that I am allowed to reproduce, distribute and publicly display the "work" that is permanently installed on public ground. --Plozessor 17:15, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

•  Support  Thank you. I changed my vote. So now it got clear. Additionally I raised that question in the forum and got some help. → Please see it here: Question at Village Pump Copyright: about this case in general --August (talk) 22:05, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --August (talk) 22:05, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Домашняя_красноухая_черепаха_06.jpg

• Nomination Trachemys scripta elegans --Lvova 20:15, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
  
•  Oppose Face lacks sharpness, sorry. --Gower 19:26, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
  

• Would like to hear others. --Lvova 20:31, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose The head is blurry. The focus appears to be on the front part of the shell. Sorry --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:16, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:16, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Demo_of_human_skeleton.jpg

• Nomination Demo of human skeleton --Dev Jadiya 15:11, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
  
•  Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:59, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose Too strong and non uniform flash, right crop unfortunate --Poco a poco 21:35, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not QI for me (I do not find it acceptable under any circumstances), and for Poco a poco--Lmbuga 23:51, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --LexKurochkin 06:09, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Tenement_house,_28_Grodzka_Street,_Old_Town,_Kraków,_Poland_(2).jpg

• Nomination Tenement house, 28 Grodzka Street, Old Town, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 09:31, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
  
•  Oppose  Overprocessed the image was taken from such a steep angle, that its vertical lines should have remained as they were form that angle. To get a straight perspective from this subject the camera would have to be higher, or it could be done by using a wide angle in portrait orientation, placing the subject at the top to reduce the cameras upwards tilt. But shooting like this and then correcting the perspective this hard leads to very intense proportional distortion. --Augustgeyler 09:14, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  
•  Support I don't like so much those kind of pictures because there are not very well cropped. A lot of architectural elements and street furnitures are cut. But, I think there perspective correction aren't so distorted. --Sebring12Hrs 21:39, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Support I don't like the photo (a matter of taste), but it's IQ for me. I don't see the distortion as being that intense: the small window panes are still square (IMO!).--Lmbuga 00:03, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --LexKurochkin 06:08, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Tenement_house,_50_Grodzka_Street,_Kraków,_Poland_(2).jpg

• Nomination Tenement house, 50 Grodzka Street, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 07:51, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
  
•  Oppose Distortion due to intense perspective correction. --Augustgeyler 16:49, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
  
•  Support I would like to hear other opinions. --Sebring12Hrs 21:35, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Support QI, clearly. --Lmbuga 23:47, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --LexKurochkin 06:07, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

File:2025_Albrechtshalle_w_Lądku-Zdroju_(4).jpg

• Nomination Albrechtshalle in Lądek-Zdrój 2 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 14:28, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
  
•  Comment Weird angle of shooting. --Екатерина Борисова 03:18, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

• @Екатерина Борисова: I have no other option, there were branches around the drone.--Jacek Halicki 00:32, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  

•  Oppose I understand, but it makes the image not QI in my eyes. Feel free to send it to CR if you disagree. --Екатерина Борисова 03:15, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  

•  Comment I disagree --Jacek Halicki 18:34, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

•  Weak support I would never put this photo in my living room because it's awful (), but I don't think it's worthless and I think it could be QI.--Lmbuga (talk) 20:53, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --LexKurochkin 06:06, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Tejedor_búfalo_de_cabeza_blanca_(Dinemellia_dinemelli),_parque_nacional_de_Tarangire,_Tanzania,_2024-05-24,_DD_19.jpg

• Nomination White-headed buffalo weaver (Dinemellia dinemelli), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 20:19, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 22:54, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose CAs. The eyes and beak are blurry, IMO. The eyes appear lifeless.--Lmbuga 23:14, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Augustgeyler 08:26, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

File:20250703_Sanatorio_de_Abona_23.jpg

• Nomination View up to the cross of the ruined church of the Sanatorio de Abona in Arico, Tenerife, Spain --FlocciNivis 17:23, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Serebit 18:18, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Tilted IMO. Vignetting? --Lmbuga 21:18, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  •  Comment I tried to fix both issues --FlocciNivis 20:20, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Much better. Thanks. Good quality--Lmbuga 15:44, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Augustgeyler 08:25, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Jersey_lily_(Amaryllis_belladonna)_flower,_Praça_João_do_Rio,_Lisbon,_Portugal_julesvernex2.jpg

• Nomination Jersey lily (Amaryllis belladonna) flower, Praça João do Rio, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 12:06, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --IM027 20:47, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree. Too much of the flower is out of focus. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:33, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

• (Robert, expanding here on my response to another nomination where you expressed a similar opinion) I think there are two ways of taking a good shot of a flower: a) have everything in focus (good for documenting, often comes at the expense of lack of perceived depth); or b) focusing on a specific part of the flower (less informative, but the transition from in-focus to out-of-focus lends a sense of depth to the image - "3D pop", some call it). This image falls in the latter category: I experimented with the aperture (eventually landing on f6 equiv.) to get the stamen (is that the right name?) in focus and the petals blending into a nice smooth background. --Julesvernex2 09:07, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

• Thanks for the explanations. I understand your intention, but a composition with such a small part of the photo in focus still does not work for me. Let's just wait for more opinions. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 14:33, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

•  Neutral I understand the points that have been raised. In this case, I find it difficult to make a clear judgement. There is a valid reason to focus the depth of field on this small detail — the stamen is an essential part of the flower. However, against that speaks the fact that this is a wide overall view of the blossom, meaning that the out-of-focus area is quite large. Concentrating on such a small detail would work better if the framing were tighter. --Augustgeyler 14:41, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Support I find the comment convincing. --Lmbuga 15:48, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Augustgeyler 08:24, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Hipolitów_house,_3_Mariacki_Square,_Old_Town,_Kraków,_Poland_(1).jpg

• Nomination Hipolitów house, 3 Mariacki square, Old Town, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 09:31, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:25, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Proportional distortion due to very intense PC. --Augustgeyler 09:26, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Support @Augustgeyler: distortion, if any, is minimal, look at the shadow of the gutter, that building has curved walls, it's very old, I lived in that town ;) --Gower 19:35, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't understand the picture or why the windows aren't photographed from the front. Random file? I don't understand the lack of balance. --Lmbuga 20:42, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose I don't see any significant distortion here, but per Lmbuga. -- Екатерина Борисова 04:13, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Augustgeyler 09:00, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

File:1998_Nissan_Fairlady_Z_2by2_300ZX_Twin_Turbo_T-Bar_Roof.jpg

• Nomination 1998 Nissan Fairlady Z 2by2 300ZX Twin Turbo --TTTNIS 12:35, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:02, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose I think the image is  Overprocessed and slightly  Underexposed. See the very small file size compared to camera and resolution. Too many details got lost by processing and in dark black shadows. --Augustgeyler 09:01, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
  •  Question @Augustgeyler: I don't see any compression artefacts. Why do you think a small filesize is a problem? --MB-one 16:49, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
    • I have nothing against small file sizes in general, and I didn’t mention any compression artefacts. What I meant to point out is that some texture details seem to have been lost during processing. Combined with the underexposed shadows, the comparatively small file size – considering the camera model – suggests a loss of detail in post-processing. --Augustgeyler 17:14, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Support May be the background is a little bit distracting because other cars are merging with the subject car, but sharpness and brightness are ok. --Sebring12Hrs 19:05, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Sebring12Hrs 19:05, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Row_of_houses_behind_a_pedestrian_tunnel_in_Gamla_Stan.jpg

• Nomination A row of brightly painted houses behind a pedestrian tunnel in an alley in Gamla Stan, the old town of Stockholm, Sweden. --OleNeitzel 16:49, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 16:52, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose The light is harsh in the background (but I know it is very hard from this dark vault). Let's see what others think. --Sebring12Hrs 18:23, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment I agree with you. The highlights on the building at the end of the street are blown out. The question for me is whether that alone is enough to disqualify the whole image as a QI. I tend to think the issue is minor enough, but I’m very interested to hear other opinions. --August (talk) 09:55, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Augustgeyler 08:28, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Autun_-_Fontaine_Saint-Lazare_-_2.jpg

• Nomination Autun (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Saint Lazarus fountain --Benjism89 06:56, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:32, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree. It is leaning a little to the right (see also the door in the background) and the background with the constraction works is distrecting. Why f13 at 38mm? --JoachimKohler-HB 10:27, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

•  Info I edited perspective, so that most elements look straight. But as in many old places, not all buildings and structures are straight in reality --Benjism89 18:54, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Good IMO --Lmbuga 22:27, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but the upper half of the fountain is unsharp. -- Екатерина Борисова 02:04, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 14:45, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Autun_-_Musée_Rolin_-_Tentation_d'Ève.jpg

• Nomination Autun (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Collections from the Rolin museum, temporarily displayed at Naturel history museum - Part of a lintel from the cathedral, depicting the Temptation of Eve --Benjism89 06:56, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Overprocessed, it's like the sculpture is in a starry sky. --Sebring12Hrs 09:28, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

•  Done Then it's underprocessed, not overprocessed, as the starry sky is noise ;) I gave it another try --Benjism89 18:54, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose The edges between the light and dark areas are unnatural, in my opinion. Overprocessed, in my opinion. Notice the edge of the upper corner of the object and the very strange dotted line. --Lmbuga 22:23, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose poor detailing, probably too high compression or overprocessed, sorry; beautiful relief btw --Gower 19:37, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Augustgeyler 08:10, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Autun_-_Musée_Rolin_-_Claus_de_Werve,_Portrait_d'évêque.jpg

• Nomination Autun (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Collections from the Rolin museum, temporarily displayed at Naturel history museum - Statue of a bishop, attributed to Claus de Werve --Benjism89 06:56, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Bad processed, posterised --George Chernilevsky 06:59, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

•  Done Thanks for your review, I gave it another try with other NR parameters --Benjism89 18:54, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose Sorry, overprocessed IMO--Lmbuga 22:18, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose very bad texture quality, high color noise in shadows --Gower 19:40, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Gower 19:40, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Rotterdam,_de_Hef_RM513922_vanaf_de_Stieltjesstraat_IMG_0390_2025-09-13_22.07.jpg

• Nomination Rotterdam-NL, monumental railway bridge (de Hef) from the Stieltjesstraat --Michielverbeek 06:12, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:25, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not sharp enough. --Sebring12Hrs 10:37, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Weak support Not the best composition, but I think it is sharp enough an can be QI. --Augustgeyler 09:57, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Augustgeyler 08:06, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Rotterdam,_de_Willemsbrug_IMG_0408_2025-09-13_22.56.jpg

• Nomination Rotterdam-NL, bridge: the Willemsbrug --Michielverbeek 06:12, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Llez 06:23, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not sharp enough. --Sebring12Hrs 10:38, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Augustgeyler 08:04, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Peucetia_viridans,_Sierra_de_Guadalupe,_Mexico_20251108p2.jpg

• Nomination Peucetia viridana (Green Lynx Spider), adult female with egg sac, on a prickly pear, Sierra de Guadalupe, Mexico.: --Cvmontuy 14:10, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Not sharp enough IMO. --Sebring12Hrs 14:25, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Very sharp with good focus on eyes, artistic low DOF --George Chernilevsky 09:51, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Eyes are in focus and most of the body. --Augustgeyler 10:42, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Support not very sharp indeed, but valuable and good enough imo --Gower 19:43, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Gower 19:43, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Tenement_house,_28_Grodzka_Street,_Old_Town,_Kraków,_Poland_(3).jpg

• Nomination Tenement house, 28 Grodzka Street, Old Town, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 09:31, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support QI but you may consider to take pictures with more encyclopaedic value, uploaded again and again the same stuff is of no big benefit fo the project, I believe. --Poco a poco 10:25, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Distortion due to intense perspective correction. --Augustgeyler 16:49, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:48, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Support I see no distortion here. -- Екатерина Борисова 02:08, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment The author has addressed the issue of converging verticals through a very strong correction. However, the original was taken from an extremely low angle, so the adjustment had to be drastic to make the verticals appear straight. In my view, this intervention went too far: it resulted in visibly altered proportions, and the windows now have a different aspect ratio. In addition, the file size increased from 3 MB to 10 MB solely due to rendering. Therefore, such an image should either: a) clearly retain its converging lines as an intentional perspective, or b) be taken from a higher position or with a wider lens and less tilt, or c) if neither is possible, unfortunately cannot be considered QI. --August (talk) 09:03, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Support ok, not distorted --Gower 19:44, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Gower 19:44, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Tenement_house,_28_Grodzka_Street,_Old_Town,_Kraków,_Poland_(1).jpg

• Nomination Tenement house, 28 Grodzka Street, Old Town, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 07:51, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:54, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose unrealistic proportions due to strong PC. --Augustgeyler 16:49, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:47, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Support In first version proportions of these windows are just the same, so I don't see something unrealistic here. -- Екатерина Борисова 02:10, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment The author has addressed the issue of converging verticals through a very strong correction. However, the original was taken from an extremely low angle, so the adjustment had to be drastic to make the verticals appear straight. In my view, this intervention went too far: it resulted in visibly altered proportions, and the windows now have a different aspect ratio. In addition, the file size increased from 3 MB to 10 MB solely due to rendering. --Augustgeyler 09:04, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment The increasing of the file size is not so revelant to me. And I don't see the difference with the previous aspect ratio, or it is very little. --Sebring12Hrs 17:32, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

• The perspective of the window frames and the lintels above clearly indicates a strongly upward-looking viewpoint, while the artificially applied perspective correction gives the impression of a frontal shot. --Augustgeyler 17:35, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 14:48, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Erchin_-_Vue_sur_Monchecourt_St_Roch.jpg

• Nomination Erchin - Vue sur Monchecourt St Roch --JackyM59 18:10, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Main subject (village) is far away, and there are loads of distractions --Earth605 15:40, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Ok to me. --Sebring12Hrs 15:01, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose I think these vegetable gardens are directly related to the village, so the village is not far away. But I don't like burned out sky. -- Екатерина Борисова 02:14, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good IMO. --Lmbuga 20:20, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 14:49, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Orthodox_Church_of_the_Assumption_of_St._Mary,_24_Szpitalna_Street,_Old_Town,_Krakow,_Poland.jpg

• Nomination Orthodox Church of the Assumption of St. Mary, 24 Szpitalna Street, Old Town, Krakow, Poland --Igor123121 20:22, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Earth605 07:23, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose unrealistic proportions due to intense perspective correction --Augustgeyler 16:49, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose PC went wrong +average optical resolution --Gower 11:21, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Gower 11:21, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

File:St._Tryphon_Square_South.jpg

• Nomination Southern side of St. Tryphon Square in Kotor / Montenegro --Imehling 12:02, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Comment It looks underexposed. --Sebring12Hrs 12:43, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Just an early morning picture. I've uploaded a new version. Maybe better now. --Imehling 19:52, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
    •  Comment Light is good now, but there are strong purple CAs at left and right. --Sebring12Hrs 02:31, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
      •  Done --Imehling 09:12, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
        • There are still CAs. --Sebring12Hrs 19:15, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
          •  Done Ok, another attempt --Imehling 20:34, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
          •  Comment You don't see them ? --Sebring12Hrs 07:38, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
            • Honestly no --Imehling 11:12, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
              • See note. --Sebring12Hrs 21:34, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
                • Thanks, I hope I've got it now. --Imehling 19:10, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
                  •  Support Yes, well done, you finally got there !! ;) --Sebring12Hrs 09:59, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose From what I can see on the map of the square, it seems that there are times of day when the lighting could be much better. --IM027 21:00, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
  • So please go to CR, but don't reset to nomination. --Sebring12Hrs 09:39, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Support QI to me.--Ermell 10:41, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose I think the image is technically good but the chosen lighting is not. The blue late evening light does not add to the scene here but makes it hard to detect te details of the shadowed buildings in front of the relatively bright sky. --Augustgeyler 12:40, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good, and nice IMO --Lmbuga 15:56, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose unfavorable light, could be better --Gower 11:20, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → More votes?   --Gower 11:20, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Bolghar_Cathedral_Mosque_Minaret_Interior_2024-07-12_1089.jpg

• Nomination Interior of the Minaret of the Cathedral mosque, Bolghar. --Mike1979 Russia 09:20, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 19:05, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not sharp enough IMO. Other opinions? --Екатерина Борисова 03:21, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment The outside is quite rich, but inevitably not very sharp. The effect is that you would like to get more details, but you can't. --Harlock81 10:30, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Since the subject of the nomination is the minaret rather than its background, it seems sufficient to me that the focus is on the structure itself. The minaret is well captured. It would certainly be nice to see a bit more detail in the distance, but that becomes a matter of style and personal preference. --Augustgeyler 10:03, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose not sharp enough indeed, interesting anyway --Gower 11:16, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Gower 11:16, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Intermediate_periwinkle_(Vinca_difformis),_Calouste_Gulbenkian_Garden,_Lisbon,_Portugal_julesvernex2-2.jpg

• Nomination Intermediate periwinkle (Vinca difformis), Calouste Gulbenkian Garden, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 11:34, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
  
•  Oppose Nice, but too shallow DoF, only one flower in focus without leaves. --Gower 17:22, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
  

•  Comment Indeed: as the title indicates, the subject is a single flower (in-focus, prominently placed, well lit), the rest of the frame is there for context. More depth-of-field would make the flower stand out less and harshen the bokeh --Julesvernex2 18:47, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

•  Support I think that it may be a creative intent of the author to focus only one flower. Good image. Юрий Д.К. 18:45, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Per Юрий Д.К.--Lmbuga 15:45, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose The part of the photo that is in focus is much too small IMO. Sorry --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:53, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

• I'm afraid I don't understand this argument: as long as there's a clear intent behind using a shallow depth-of-field, one shouldn't impose hard limits to the proportion of the image that is in focus. Sometimes everything needs to be in focus (I often use focus stacking to achieve this), sometimes it doesn't --Julesvernex2 11:48, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 17:55, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Moscow_-_2025_-_Pashkov's_House1.jpg

• Nomination Moscow - 2025 - Pashkov's House --Юрий Д.К. 20:36, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Difficult corner, but imo the trees are disturbing the composition too much --Michielverbeek 18:37, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
  

•  Comment I disagree. This view has a right to photographing but it isn't possible to shot side of the building without trees --Юрий Д.К. 21:00, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. I like the composition. --Sebring12Hrs 19:01, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment I have a feeling that the photo was somehow turned, because bushes even on a slope can't grow at that angle, it's completely unnatural. Therefore, the impression of the picture is very strange. -- Екатерина Борисова 03:35, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
  • @Екатерина Борисова: Hi. I am surprised a bit that "because bushes even on a slope can't grow at that angle, it's completely unnatural". [Here] is approx. point where the photo has been taken. Юрий Д.К. 09:51, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
    • I'm far more surprised by this panorama :) Looks like a kind of topiary art. But in your other shot made from this point of view the bushes grow straight. I'm not opposing your image, I just don't understand. -- Екатерина Борисова 03:56, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
      • On the last photo only upper edges of the bushes is visible. Of course it will be illusion that they are straight :-) Юрий Д.К. 21:52, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Sebring12Hrs 19:01, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Street_vendor,_Via_Cesario_Console,_Naples,_Italy_(PPL1-Corrected)_julesvernex2.jpg

• Nomination Street vendor, Via Cesario Console, Naples, Italy (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 18:23, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
  
•  Oppose Photo is not bad, but I am not convinced. Most of the vendor's goods are covered + lot of vehicles in the background give for me feeling of overload and disharmony, sorry. --Gower 19:08, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
  

•  Info I think that's a great critique. For me though, it's precisely that overload and disharmony that draws me to this picture (it's a personal favourite), as it immediately puts me back in Naples. I also like how the wide angle exaggerates the size of the woman and the bench, making them stand out against the background. Moving to CR in hopes of hearing more more opinions --Julesvernex2 20:02, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

•  Weak support To me using 19 mm lens for a portrait is not a good idea, especially for so close distance, but, yes, it created some artistic impression form the photo in whole. It is a portrait, the subject is sharp and level of detail is high, so, technically it is good for QI. --LexKurochkin 08:06, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Support I don't see the problem. Good quality--Lmbuga 16:03, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose The bench is captured nicely. But as the title tells the intention to show the vendor I think the composition is not able to do so. --Augustgeyler 16:15, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

@Augustgeyler: Just out of curiosity, and because I can't think of another title: What title would you think is appropriate?, well, there might be a solution. Perhaps "Street vendor stretching out on a bench because she is tired"? Would it be sufficient for the text to appear in the description and not in the title? --Lmbuga 15:16, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

• I think that might work. --Augustgeyler 16:27, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

• @Julesvernex2: It's a very good picture, Please, change the description. If you want. --Lmbuga 17:12, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

• Thanks guys, I've updated the description to something along those lines. By the way, pings don't work for me on this page, is that a general issue? --

•  Support  Thank you. These pings don't work for me here as well … --Augustgeyler 17:46, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

• I like your description much more than the one I suggested. Thank you --Lmbuga 18:16, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --August (talk) 17:47, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Temple_de_Minerve_-_Sbeitla.jpg

• Nomination Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Skander zarrad 08:08, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
  
•  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 08:58, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose Already declined. --Sebring12Hrs 09:36, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment @Skander zarrad: The perspective has been corrected in this new version, but the dust spot are still there. I added two notes on the picture. --Harlock81 15:21, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose There are minor Dust spots but most importantly the description is missing. --Augustgeyler 16:29, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

   Info I added descriptions in English and in German. The photo was downscaled from the first version. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:05, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Good now. --Augustgeyler 14:22, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose downscaled version --Robert Flogaus-Faust 00:39, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --LexKurochkin 06:38, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Church_tower_–_Church_of_Our_Saviour,_Copenhagen.jpg

• Nomination Church tower – Church of Our Saviour, Copenhagen. The external staircase turns four times counterclockwise around the spire. --OleNeitzel 23:35, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:03, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose Good sharpness, and I will support if the three dust spots will be removed. Sorry. --Sebring12Hrs 18:48, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Yes those Dust spots should be removed. Otherwise a very good image. --August (talk) 16:22, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --LexKurochkin 06:33, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

Timetable (day 8 after nomination)

• Thu 06 Nov → Fri 14 Nov
• Fri 07 Nov → Sat 15 Nov
• Sat 08 Nov → Sun 16 Nov
• Sun 09 Nov → Mon 17 Nov
• Mon 10 Nov → Tue 18 Nov
• Tue 11 Nov → Wed 19 Nov
• Wed 12 Nov → Thu 20 Nov
• Thu 13 Nov → Fri 21 Nov
• Fri 14 Nov → Sat 22 Nov